Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K032734
    Date Cleared
    2004-04-08

    (217 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    876.5980
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CONVATEC FECAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    For the fecal management of patients with little or no bowel control and for patients whose stool is semi-liquid or liquid

    Device Description

    ConvaTec Fecal Management System

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the ConvaTec Fecal Management System. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device and biocompatibility testing. The document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving performance against such criteria. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text.

    Here's a breakdown of what is and is not in the document:

    What is present:

    • Device Name: ConvaTec Fecal Management System
    • Applicant: ConvaTec
    • Intended Use/Indications: Fecal management for patients with little or no bowel control and for patients whose stool is semi-liquid or liquid.
    • Predicate Device: Indwelling Fecal Management System (K012113)
    • Classification: Gastrointestinal tube and accessories, 21 CFR 876.5980, Class II
    • Biocompatibility Testing: States that testing was done according to ISO 10993 Part I (FDA modified matrix) and concluded the device is non-sensitizing, non-cytotoxic, and non-irritating.
    • Regulatory Outcome: 510(k) clearance (substantial equivalence determination).

    What is not present (and is required for your request):

    • Specific acceptance criteria for device performance.
    • Any study results (clinical or performance bench testing beyond biocompatibility) demonstrating the device meets performance criteria.
    • Sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, ground truth establishment for a performance study.
    • Information about expert involvement for ground truth, adjudication methods, or MRMC studies.
    • Standalone algorithm performance or training set details.

    A 510(k) submission, especially for a device demonstrating substantial equivalence, often does not include detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria in the same way a de novo or PMA submission might. The "performance" in this context is often inferred from the predicate device and relevant bench testing (like biocompatibility and basic functional tests not detailed here).

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1