Search Results

Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing is indicated for deep, moderately to highly exuding stage II, III and IV pressure ulcers, leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and burns with significant loss of tissue.

Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing maintains a moist wound environment that supports wound healing on wounds that are colonized or wounds where the risk of infection exists.

Contreet Foam Cavity dressings contain an antibacterial ingredient. The dressings demonstrate in-vitro antibacterial activity for up to 7 days. Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing is effective against certain bacterial strains known to be detrimental to wound healing.

Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing can be used on patients with wound infection at the discretion of a physician.

Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing with Silver dressings are indicated for deep wounds with moderate to high amounts of exudate.

Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing with Silver is indicated for stage II, III and IV pressure ulcers, leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and first or second degree burns with significant loss of tissue.

Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing is a highly absorbent foam cavity dressing with ionic silver as the active component in the dressing. The cavity dressing is suitable for exuding, deep wounds and is perforated to ensure flexible handling. The cavity dressing provides an optimal moist wound healing environment. combining an effective antibacterial activity in the dressing with exudates management.

The provided text does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving device performance in the context of AI/ML or diagnostic devices.

The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called "Contreet Foam Cavity Dressing with silver," which is a topical wound dressing. The performance data discussed is related to its physical and biological properties as a wound dressing, not artificial intelligence or diagnostic algorithms.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
• Sample sizes, data provenance, or details about test sets.
• Number of experts, qualifications, or adjudication methods for ground truth.
• MRMC comparative effectiveness study details.
• Standalone performance information.
• Type of ground truth used.
• Training set sample size or how its ground truth was established.

This information is specific to the evaluation of AI/ML-based diagnostic devices, which is not the subject of this 510(k) submission.

Ask a specific question about this device