Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K953205
    Date Cleared
    1996-05-23

    (359 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    868.2775
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The intended use of the NS272 is for the application of an electrical current to a patient in External (nerve stimulation) and Internal (nerve location) modes of operation. In External mode this is to test the level of pharmacological effect of anesthetic drugs and gases for neuromuscular blockade monitoring. In Internal mode this is for the location of nerves for the administering of anesthetic drugs to accurately achieve neuromuscular blockage.

    Device Description

    The NS272 is enclosed in a thermoplastic case consisting of four components, held together by clips and screws. Fourteen device control buttons and an LCD display window are located on the front panel. Three connector sockets for current delivery are located on the top end of the unit. Two are 4mm banana-type sockets for the proximal and distal External mode (nerve stimulation) leadwire. One is a 2.5mm miniature audio-type socket for the Internal mode (nerve location) leadwire. The NS272 is internally powered and uses three AA-size batteries, which fit into an enclosure on the back of the unit. This battery compartment cover is configured to allow the unit to be slid into an optional mounting bracket. The NS272 measures 170 × 73 × 43mm, and weighs 0.185kg without batteries (0.255kg with batteries). It contains a single printed circuit board, to which the device buttons, output sockets and display LCD are directly mounted. The standard accessories are patient leadwires of 1.5m in length, with ECG clips for attachment to skin surface electrodes, or alligator clip for attachment to a nerve location needle.

    The NS272 output current pulses are square wave, monophasic, constant current and unidirectional. Pulse width is approximately 0.2ms, with maximum available current levels of 160mA External and 10mA Internal. Twitch. Train of Four. Tetanus. Double Burst and Post-Tetanic Count pulse trains are available for External mode. while only Twitch can be used in Internal mode. Repeat pulse patterns of 1 sec Twitch and 12 sec Train of Four are available. A programming mode allows selection of maximum External mode current, External mode current steps, Tetanus frequency and Double Burst pattern options. User-definable programs of available pulse trains and timing can also be stored. Audible and visual indicators of current delivery are used, with a pulse-not-delivered alarm in External mode. The NS272 features a low battery indicator, pulse delivery mute, Post-Tetanic Count five-minute lockout to prevent excessive use of this pulse train, and an automatic 30 minute switch-off.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Information for the Fisher & Paykel NS272 Peripheral Nerve Stimulator/Locator. It describes modifications to an existing device and attests to its equivalent safety and effectiveness.

    However, the provided text does not contain the specific information requested in your numbered list regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving those criteria are met.

    Here is a breakdown of what is present and what is missing:

    What is present:

    • Device Description and Intended Use: Details about the NS272, its operation modes (External for nerve stimulation, Internal for nerve location), and accessories.
    • Modifications to the Predicate Device: Specific changes made to the original NS272 (K924234), such as output circuit clamping components, high voltage regulator, current controller regulators, shrouded internal mode leadsets, and direct mounting of output sockets to the PCB.
    • General Testing Information: Mentions "Testing of the modified NS272 has been carried out to establish correct operation and performance of the device." It also notes "Specific testing to particular modifications verifies changes" and "Performance testing ensures correct functioning of the device under all specification conditions, including tests for delivered current accuracy, correct delivery of Internal and External mode currents, and operation at varying battery levels."

    What is missing (and therefore, I cannot fill out your requested table and study details):

    1. A specific table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance: While the document implies performance specifications exist ("within the modified specifications"), it does not list them in a comparative table.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and data provenance: No information on how many devices were tested, in what setting, or the origin of any data used.
    3. Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth: This type of medical device assessment typically involves engineering and electrical performance testing, not expert clinical interpretation of results in the way image analysis or diagnostic AI might. Thus, "experts" in that sense are not relevant or mentioned.
    4. Adjudication method: Not applicable for engineering performance testing described.
    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable for a nerve stimulator's technical performance testing. This type of study is for evaluating observer performance with diagnostic tools.
    6. Standalone (algorithm only) performance: Not applicable as this is a hardware device, not an AI algorithm.
    7. Type of ground truth used: For this device, ground truth would be the expected electrical outputs and waveforms as defined by engineers and standards. The document mentions "according to specification" but doesn't detail the ground truth source.
    8. Sample size for the training set: Not applicable as this is not a machine learning/AI device that undergoes a "training" phase with data.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

    In summary, the provided text describes modifications to a medical device and broadly states that essential performance testing was conducted to ensure its continued safety and effectiveness in line with its specifications. However, it does not provide the detailed quantitative acceptance criteria or a formal study report with specific outcomes that would allow me to populate your requested table and answer many of your specific questions.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1