Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(37 days)
Not Found
The proposed device, the small bone screw claims substantial equivalence to a currently marketed device, the Synthes mini-fragment bone screw. The Synthes screws and the proposed device are both available in Titanium and Stainless Steel. Both function as internal fixation for bones and have no significant design differences.
The provided text does not contain information about an AI/ML powered device, its acceptance criteria, or a study proving its performance. Instead, it describes a 510(k) summary for a small bone screw claiming substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
Therefore, I cannot answer your request regarding acceptance criteria and a study for an AI/ML device, as the provided input is irrelevant to that topic.
The input describes a medical device, a small bone screw, and its claim of substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Synthes mini-fragment bone screw) based on material (Titanium and Stainless Steel) and function (internal fixation for bones) with no significant design differences. This is a common process for regulatory clearance of traditional medical devices, not AI/ML driven ones.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1