Search Results

The Comfeel® Seasorb Dressing is indicated for use (under the guidance of a health care professional) in management of moderate to heavily exudating wounds, partial and full thickness wounds, including leg ulcers and pressure sores.

The revised Comfeel® Seasorb Dressing consists of an absorbent calcium sodium alginate/sodium carboxymethy/ceilulose xerogel cast onto a high density polyethylene net. The dressing is supplied in three sizes: 4 x 6 cm (3705), and 10 x 10 cm (3710) and 15 x 15 cm (3715). The dressings are packaged in individual pouches and sterilized by ethylene oxlde.

Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the Comfeel® Seasorb Dressing, focusing on acceptance criteria and supporting studies:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Note: This submission primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (K953497). The acceptance criteria are largely inferred from the statement that the modified device "has been tested and shown" to meet certain safety and performance characteristics, and that its performance has been "improved" compared to the predicate. There are no explicit numerical acceptance criteria stated for these tests in the provided text.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The provided 510(k) summary does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for any of the tests. It simply mentions that the device "has been tested."

Regarding data provenance:

• The information provided is a 510(k) summary, which typically summarizes the results of various tests. It does not specify the country of origin of the data or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective. Given the nature of biocompatibility and physical performance tests for a medical device, these would typically be conducted prospectively in a controlled laboratory setting.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

The document does not mention the use of experts to establish a ground truth for testing, nor does it refer to any clinical studies where expert consensus would be required. The tests mentioned (biocompatibility, softness, absorption) are laboratory-based performance tests, not clinical evaluations requiring expert interpretation of outcomes.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

As there's no mention of a clinical study or expert-adjudicated data, an adjudication method is not applicable or not specified in this document. The assessment for the reported performance metrics (biocompatibility, physical properties) would have been based on established laboratory protocols and measurements, not subjective expert agreement.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If so, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve With AI vs Without AI Assistance

No MRMC study was performed. This device is a topical wound dressing, not an imaging or diagnostic device that would typically involve human readers or AI assistance in interpretation. Therefore, there's no information on an effect size for human readers improving with or without AI.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

No standalone algorithm performance study was done. This device is a passive wound dressing and does not involve any algorithms or AI components.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" for the tests described is based on:

• Established laboratory standards and methods: For biocompatibility (irritation, sensitization, cytotoxicity), the "ground truth" would be determined by the results of standardized assays that demonstrate compliance with predefined safety thresholds.
• Physical measurement techniques: For properties like softness and absorption capacity, the "ground truth" would be derived from quantifiable physical measurements following specific testing protocols.

There is no mention of pathology, outcomes data, or expert consensus in establishing the ground truth for these specific performance metrics.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not Applicable. This device does not use machine learning or AI, and therefore, there is no training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not Applicable. As there is no training set, there is no ground truth established for it.

Ask a specific question about this device