Search Results

The Bayer Healthcare Clinitest hCG Pregnancy Test is for in vitro diagnostic use as a qualitative method in the rapid detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine specimens. The test is utilized with the Clinitest Status analyzer and is intended for near patient (point of care) and centralized laboratory locations.

The Clinitest® hCG is a qualitative test for the rapid detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in urine. The device is read by the Clinitek Status instrument.

This document describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Clinitest® hCG Pregnancy Test. The information provided focuses on the device's substantial equivalence to predicate devices and general regulatory information, rather than a detailed study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria with performance metrics.

Therefore, many of the requested sections (e.g., sample sizes for test and training sets, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC study details, ground truth specifics for training) cannot be extracted from the provided text. The document is a regulatory submission summary, not a full study report.

However, I can extract the following based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly state numerical "acceptance criteria" for performance metrics (like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy) or report specific device performance values in a table. It only states that the device has "similar technological characteristics, device performance and intended use" to its predicate devices.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

Not provided in the document.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not provided in the document.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not provided in the document.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This device is a rapid diagnostic test read by an instrument (Clinitek Status analyzer), not an AI-assisted diagnostic imaging device requiring human reader interpretation in the context of MRMC studies.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

The device, when read by the Clinitek Status instrument, operates in a "standalone" manner for interpreting the test result (positive, borderline, or negative). However, the document does not provide a standalone performance study report with specific metrics. It simply describes the device's function.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

Not provided in the document. For pregnancy tests, ground truth typically involves confirmation with a more definitive method (e.g., quantitative hCG measurement, clinical outcome).

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable/Not provided. This is a point-of-care rapid diagnostic test, not an AI/machine learning device that would typically have a "training set" in the computational sense. The "training" for such devices usually refers to manufacturing process development, reagent optimization, and internal verification/validation, not a dataset for algorithm training.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable/Not provided (as per point 8).

Ask a specific question about this device