Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(135 days)
CIRCUL8 Luxe DVT Prevention Device
CIRCUL8 Luxe, is intended to be an easy to use portable system, prescribed by a physician, for use in the home or clinical setting to help prevent the onset of DVT in patients by stimulating blood flow in the extremities (simulating muscle contractions).
This device can be used to:
- · Aid in the prevention of DVT;
- · Enhance blood circulation:
- · Diminish post-operative pain and swelling:
- · Reduce wound healing time;
· Aid in the treatment and healing of: stasis dermatitis, venous stasis ulcers, arterial and diabetic leg ulcers, chronic venous insufficiency and reduction of edema in the lower limbs.
The unit can also be used as an aid in the prophylaxis for DVT by persons expecting to be stationary for long periods of time.
The CIRCUL8 Luxe DVT Prevention Device is an ambulatory, portable, light weight, prescriptive intermittent pneumatic compression system intended to provide sequential compression therapy to a patient's lower limbs. The purpose of the CIRCUL8 Luxe is to aid in the prevention of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) by helping to stimulate blood flow in the legs. This is accomplished by an electronically controlled pump delivering a set amount of air to the leg cuffs that, in turn, compress the calf or calves to aid blood flow out of the lower extremities. The pump will inflate each leg cuff to a pre-set pressure of 60mmHg (± 5 mmHg) and deflate once the pressure is reached. The cycles are repeated on each unit until the power is turned off. Internal rechargeable batteries (Li ion) allow the CIRCUL8 Luxe to be completely portable, thus preventing interruptions in treatment.
The provided document describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the CIRCUL8 Luxe DVT Prevention Device. This regulatory submission primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a detailed performance study with extensive acceptance criteria for complex AI algorithms.
Therefore, many of the typical acceptance criteria and study elements associated with AI/ML-driven medical devices (like MRMC studies, expert adjudication for ground truth of an AI, or large sample sizes for AI training/test sets) are not applicable to this traditional medical device submission. The device is a pneumatic compression system, not an AI/ML diagnostic or prognostic tool.
However, I can extract the available information related to performance testing and acceptance criteria as presented in the document based on the device's function.
CIRCUL8 Luxe DVT Prevention Device: Acceptance Criteria and Performance (Non-AI Device)
This document describes a traditional medical device (a pneumatic compression system) and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. Therefore, the "acceptance criteria" discussed are largely related to engineering specifications and safety/performance benchmarks for a physical device, not AI model performance metrics. The "study" refers to non-clinical bench testing.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria (Implied from Bench Testing) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Biocompatibility | Passed Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5), Sensitization and Irritation (ISO 10993-10) tests. |
Electrical Safety | Passed IEC 60601-1. |
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | Passed IEC 60601-1-2. |
Battery Performance (Li-ion) | Passed test requirements stated in IEC 62133-2. |
Software Verification & Validation | Met software requirements specifications for moderate level of concern. |
Pressure Delivery | Average maximum pressure reached was 62.03 mmHg. (Target pressure is 60mmHg ± 5 mmHg) |
Cycle Time | Average cycle time was 74.8 seconds. (Target cycle time is 60 seconds) |
Leakage | Average leakage test value was 58.2. (No unit provided, context suggests a measure of air retention or pressure loss) |
Burst Pressure | Average burst pressure was not less than 2x maximum operating pressure plus indicated tolerance. |
Note on Differences to Predicate:
The document also compares the CIRCUL8 Luxe's technical specifications to its predicate device (PlasmaFlow Vascular Therapy System) and notes the following "similarities" which can be interpreted as demonstrating acceptable performance relative to the predicate:
- Operating Pressure: CIRCUL8 Luxe: 60 mmHg (±5mmHg or ~8%); Predicate: 55 mmHg. Comment: "Similar; Circul8 Luxe has a tolerance of ±5mmHG from 60mmHG which equals 55mmHG to 65mmHG. The predicate's working pressure falls within the same range." This implies the predicate's 55mmHg falls within the acceptable range of the subject device's operation.
- Cycle Time: Both 60 seconds. Comment: "Same."
- System Alarms/Indicators: Both have alarms for low battery and pressure errors. CIRCUL8 Luxe's alarms cause shutoff after 30 seconds, Predicate's after 10 seconds. CIRCUL8 Luxe also has an "Adapter Error." Comment: "Similar; appropriate alarms to mitigate risks are provided in both devices, however different terminology is used (battery critical vs low battery error)."
- Physical Dimensions/Weight: Are considered "similar" despite slight numerical differences, not impacting safety or effectiveness.
- Power Supply: Different chargers with different voltage capacity, but considered "similar".
- Temperature & Humidity Operating Environment: Considered "similar" despite minor differences in specified ranges.
- Pressure Tolerances: CIRCUL8 Luxe has 8%, Predicate has 5%. Comment: "Similar; Circul8 Luxe device claims to have a wider percentage of pressure tolerance."
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The document does not specify the exact number of units or cycles tested for each non-clinical bench test. It reports "average maximum pressure," "average cycle time," "average leakage test value," and "average burst pressure," implying that multiple measurements were taken on one or more devices.
- Data Provenance: The data originates from non-clinical bench testing conducted by the device manufacturer (Ortho8 Inc.). The tests were performed to confirm that the device meets design, safety, and performance requirements and does not raise new concerns about safety and effectiveness.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
- Not Applicable. This is a traditional medical device, not an AI/ML system requiring expert-established ground truth for a test set. The "ground truth" for the device's performance is adherence to engineering specifications and international standards, measured directly by laboratory equipment during bench testing.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not Applicable. As this is non-clinical bench testing of a physical device against engineering specifications, there is no need for expert adjudication.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- Not Applicable. This is a physical medical device, not a diagnostic AI intended to assist human readers.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Performance
- Not Applicable. This device does not feature a standalone algorithm in the typical sense of AI/ML performance. Its "performance" is its mechanical function (delivering pressure for DVT prevention).
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- The "ground truth" for this device's performance is defined by:
- Engineering Specifications: Pre-defined pressure levels, cycle times, alarm responses, etc.
- International Standards: e.g., IEC 60601-1 (Electrical Safety), IEC 60601-1-2 (EMC), ISO 10993-5/10 (Biocompatibility), IEC 62133-2 (Li-ion battery).
- Comparison to Predicate Device: Demonstrating similar performance characteristics to a legally marketed device.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not Applicable. This device does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not Applicable. There is no "training set" for this traditional medical device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1