Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K022093
    Date Cleared
    2002-09-20

    (85 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.3470
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CHASE CARDIOVASCULAR PATCH KIT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CHASE Cardiovascular Patch Kit is indicated for cardiac and vascular patch grafting.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a cardiac patch. This type of document does not contain the detailed information requested regarding acceptance criteria, study design, expert involvement, or algorithm performance for an AI/ML medical device.

    The letter is a regulatory approval based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, which means the manufacturer demonstrated that their device is as safe and effective as a legally marketed device, not that it met specific performance metrics in a clinical study as would be required for AI/ML device validation.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from this document. The document primarily focuses on regulatory classification, general controls, and compliance requirements.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K020233
    Date Cleared
    2002-03-14

    (50 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.3470
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CHASE CARDIOVASCULAR PATCH KIT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CHASE Cardiovascular Patch Kit is indicated for cardiac and vascular patch grafting.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called the "Chase Cardiovascular Patch Kit." It indicates that the device has been found substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.

    However, the provided text does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, or performance data for the Chase Cardiovascular Patch Kit. Therefore, I cannot generate the requested table and detailed information based on the input.

    This type of FDA letter typically confirms that a device has passed the regulatory hurdle of substantial equivalence, but it does not usually include the technical performance data or specific study results used to demonstrate that equivalence. Those details would normally be found in the 510(k) submission itself, which is not provided here.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K020132
    Date Cleared
    2002-02-26

    (42 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.3470
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CHASE CARDIOVASCULAR PATCH KIT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Chase Cardiovascular Patch Kit is indicated for cardiac and vascular patch grafting.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device (Chase Cardiovascular Patch Kit). It does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment.

    The letter explicitly states: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device... [because] the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976..." This indicates that the clearance is based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than a detailed study proving the device meets specific performance acceptance criteria as would be described in a clinical or performance study report.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1