Search Results

The Chad Therapeutics OXYPNEUMATIC CYPRESS Model 511 is intended for prescription use only, to be used as part of a portable oxygen delivery system for patients that require supplemental oxygen in their home and for ambulatory use.

The Chad Therapeutics OXYPNEUMATIC CYPRESS Model 511 is a pneumaticcontrolled device, which is a combination of a low-pressure regulator and an oxygen conserver, designed for use with ambulatory oxygen systems. It delivers boluses of oxygen that is equivalent to 1 to 6 liters per minute, depending on the flow rate setting.

This document refers to a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Chad Therapeutics OXYPNEUMATIC CYPRESS Model 511," an oxygen conserver. The information provided is for regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, not a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in terms of clinical performance or diagnostic accuracy.

Therefore, many of the requested elements for describing "acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" are not applicable or cannot be extracted from the provided text. This document is focused on regulatory clearance and substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not a clinical performance study with specific acceptance criteria as one might expect for a diagnostic or AI-driven device.

Here's an attempt to answer the questions based only on the provided text, highlighting what is missing or not applicable:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not specify quantitative "acceptance criteria" in the way one might for diagnostic accuracy (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC thresholds). Instead, it relies on "substantial equivalence" to predicate devices and general performance, mechanical, and environmental testing.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not provided in the document. The document mentions "Performance, mechanical and environmental testing" but does not detail the methodology, sample sizes, or data provenance for these tests. This is not a clinical study in the sense of a test set with patient data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not applicable as this is not a study establishing a diagnostic ground truth or involving expert review of a test set for clinical performance. The evaluation is based on engineering and performance testing for regulatory clearance.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not applicable as this is not a study requiring adjudication of expert opinions for a test set.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This information is not applicable. This device is an oxygen conserver, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool or an imaging device requiring human reader interpretation. No MRMC study was conducted or is relevant to this type of device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

This information is not applicable. This is a physical medical device (oxygen conserver), not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the "testing" mentioned, the "ground truth" would be related to the device's technical specifications and intended function (e.g., ability to accurately deliver oxygen boluses at specified rates, durability under environmental conditions, safety criteria). However, the document does not specify the exact types of ground truth used for "Performance, mechanical and environmental testing." It likely refers to established engineering standards and specifications for oxygen delivery devices.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

Ask a specific question about this device