Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K041707
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2004-07-30

    (37 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6660
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CERCON CERAM EXPRESS CERAMIC SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Designed for use on zirconia (zirconium oxide) in single tooth or bridge type restorations. Applications include tooth anterior and posterior locations.

    Device Description

    The CERCON® CERAM EXPRESS Ceramic System consists of a dental ceramic veneering material developed for veneering zirconium oxide substructures for fixed prosthodontics devices that include both anterior and posterior crowns and bridges. The modified device is a glass/glass-ceramic mixture used to veneer zirconia substrates in a medium-pressure. lost-wax injection molding (pressing) process. The modified device consists of a translucent material and an opaque material.

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) K041707 submission focuses on a dental ceramic veneering material (CERCON® CERAM EXPRESS Ceramic System) and demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device, Cercon® Ceram S Porcelains (K022796).

    The provided text does not contain information about specific acceptance criteria, a detailed study proving performance against those criteria, or the methodology (sample size, expert qualifications, adjudication, etc.) of such a study.

    Instead, the submission primarily focuses on:

    • Device Description and Intended Use: CERCON® CERAM EXPRESS Ceramic System is a glass/glass-ceramic mixture for veneering zirconia substructures in fixed prosthodontics.
    • Technological Characteristics: It's a modification of an existing device (Cercon® Ceram S Porcelains, K022796) with changes to formulation, material form, and processing.
    • Basis for Substantial Equivalence: The manufacturer asserts substantial equivalence based on the prior use of components in legally marketed devices, similarity in formulations, and data regarding modifications. This implies that the modifications did not introduce new questions of safety or effectiveness.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment based on the provided document.

    It's important to understand that for materials like this, "performance" is often demonstrated through mechanical and biocompatibility testing (e.g., flexural strength, bond strength, cytotoxicity) rather than clinical studies with human readers or AI algorithms as would be relevant for diagnostic imaging devices. Such tests would typically compare the modified device's properties to the predicate device or established standards. However, the details of these tests are not present in the provided summary.

    Here's what can be inferred or stated about what is NOT present:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: Not available in this document.
    2. Sample Size and Data Provenance (Test Set): Not applicable or not reported for the type of comparison made. There is no "test set" in the context of human readers or AI performance.
    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications (Ground Truth): Not applicable.
    4. Adjudication Method: Not applicable.
    5. MRMC Comparative Effectiveness Study: Not conducted or reported. This device is a material, not a diagnostic tool requiring human reader interpretation or AI assistance in that sense.
    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance: Not applicable. There is no algorithm.
    7. Type of Ground Truth Used: Not applicable in the context of expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data for a diagnostic algorithm.
    8. Sample Size for Training Set: Not applicable. There's no AI model being trained.
    9. How Ground Truth for Training Set was Established: Not applicable.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K022796
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2002-09-06

    (14 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6660
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CERCON CERAM S PORCELAIN

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Designed for use on zirconia (zirconium oxide) in single tooth or bridge type restorations. Applications include both anterior and posterior locations.

    Device Description

    CERCON® CERAM S PORCELAIN is a dental ceramic veneering material developed for veneering Cercon zirconia or an equivalent zirconium oxide substructure for fixed prosthodontics devices that include both anterior and posterior crowns/bridges. The CERCON® CERAM S PORCELAIN System consists of Dentin/Transparent/Incisal, Liner/Opaque, Shoulder, and Correction/Glaze/Stain Porcelains. The final restoration matches more shades than the predicate device.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for a dental ceramic veneering material named CERCON® CERAM S PORCELAIN. It does not contain information about a study with acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert ground truth, or adjudication methods in the context of device performance metrics typically associated with AI/ML devices or diagnostic tools.

    Instead, this submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Cercon® Ceram K011333) based on:

    • Device Description: It describes the use of the new porcelain for veneering zirconia substructures in fixed prosthodontic devices.
    • Intended Use: It specifies the use on zirconia for single tooth or bridge type restorations in anterior and posterior locations.
    • Technological Characteristics: It highlights that CERCON® CERAM S PORCELAIN is a modification of the predicate device with minor formulation changes.
    • Biocompatibility: It states that the device was evaluated and passed biocompatibility testing for cytotoxicity.
    • Components: It mentions that all components have been used in legally marketed devices.

    The conclusion is that the prior use of components, similarity in formulation, and biocompatibility data support the safety and effectiveness of the new device.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and study details as they are not present in the provided text. The document is a regulatory submission for a material, not a diagnostic or AI-powered device that would typically involve such performance studies.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K011333
    Device Name
    CERCON CERAM
    Date Cleared
    2001-08-20

    (110 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6660
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    CERCON CERAM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1