Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K033667
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2004-01-23

    (63 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6660
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    CARRARA PRESS SYSTEM is intended for the fabrication of ceramic crowns, inlays, onlays or venecrs. Fabrication of ceramic crowns, inlays, onlays, or veneers.

    Device Description

    CARRARA PRESS SYSTEM is a porcelain system used for the fabrication of all-ceramic dental restorations. The system includes a core ceramic, press inlay ceramic, conditioner, and glaze.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the DENTSPLY International CARRARA PRESS SYSTEM, a porcelain system for dental restorations. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, or a study design. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on prior market history and material similarities.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
    3. Number or qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method for a test set.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study or effect size.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for a training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

    The document explicitly states: "We believe that the prior use of the components of CARRARA PRESS SYSTEM in legally marketed devices, and the historical use of the device in Europe provide sufficient evidence of the safety and effectiveness of CARRARA PRESS SYSTEM for the indicated uses." This indicates that the regulatory approval was based on demonstrating equivalence rather than a new performance study with specific acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1