Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K042798
    Date Cleared
    2004-11-04

    (27 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3060
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    C-TEK C-TRUN ANTERIOR CERVICAL PLATE SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The C-TEK C-Thru Anterior Cervical Plate System is intended for anterior interbody screw fixation of the cervical spine. This system is indicated for use in the temporary stabilization of the anterior spine from C2 to C7 during the development of cervical spinal fusions in patients with: degenerative disc disease (as defined by neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies); trauma (including fractures); primary and metastatic malignant tumors; deformity (defined as kyphosis, or scoliosis); pseudarthrosis; failed previous fusions; and/or spinal cord stenosis and cervical myelopathy.

    Device Description

    The C-TEK C-Thru Anterior Cervical Plate System consists of a variety of shapes and sizes of bone plates and screws manufactured from surgical implant grade titanium alloy as described by ASTM F 136 (Ti 6Al 4V ELI). The plates are provided in a fixed hole or slotted hole design and are available in 1 to 5 level plates. The screws are supplied color coded to identify their respective lengths. Fixation is provided by bone screws inserted into the vertebral body of the cervical spine using an anterior approach.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves a device meets such criteria. It is a 510(k) summary for the C-TEK C-Thru Anterior Cervical Plate System, detailing its classification, predicate device, indications for use, and a comparison to the predicate device. The document states that the device is considered substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device based on similar indications, intended use, materials, and equivalent biomechanical performance.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the format of a table or answer the specific questions about sample sizes, ground truth, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, or MRMC studies. This type of information is typically found in performance studies, clinical trials, or validation reports, which are not present in the provided 510(k) summary.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1