Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K962182
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-07-15

    (39 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    868.5700
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    BURLEW INFANT HOOD

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The device indicated for patients who need to be placed in an oxygen enriched environment.

    Device Description

    Disposable Infant hood with drape

    AI/ML Overview

    This medical device submission is for a Burlew Infant Hood, which is an infant oxygen hood. The document does not describe a study involving acceptance criteria and device performance in the way typically found for diagnostic or AI-driven devices (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy). Instead, it focuses on comparing the Burlew Infant Hood to predicate devices based on various attributes.

    Here's an analysis based on the provided text, recognizing its limitations regarding the specific type of "study" requested in the prompt:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The document doesn't present explicit "acceptance criteria" with numerical performance metrics like a diagnostic device. Instead, the "Performance Testing" attribute is listed as "Yes" for the Burlew device and its predicates, implying that such testing was done, but the details (criteria and results) are not provided in this summary.

    The comparison table below highlights attributes where the Burlew Infant Hood matches or improves upon predicate devices. These can be considered the "performance metrics" being assessed for this type of device, related to its design and functional capabilities rather than diagnostic accuracy.

    AttributeAcceptance Criteria (Implied)Burlew Infant Hood Performance (Reported)
    Use with patient for oxygen-rich environmentCapable of providing an oxygen-rich environmentYes
    Use in Respiratory Therapy (RT)Suitable for RT settingsYes
    Use in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)Suitable for ICU settingsYes
    Use in transportDesigned for transportYes (Superior to some predicates)
    Single patient useDisposable/single-useYes
    Use with neonate and pediatricSuitable for neonate and pediatric populationsYes
    Clear patient areaProvides visibility of patientYes
    Fittings for oxygen connectionHas necessary fittings for oxygen sourceYes
    Different sizesAvailable in multiple sizesYes
    Flexible drape to cover patientIncorporates a flexible drapeYes (Differentiating feature from one predicate)
    Collapsible for easy storageDesigned for easy storageYes (Differentiating feature from predicates)
    Panel removable for easy patient accessAllows for easy access to patientYes
    Materials (Plexiglas/polycarbonate)Uses specified hood materialsYes
    Materials (PVC drape)Uses specified drape materialYes
    Performance Testing (General)Undergone appropriate performance testing for safety/effectivenessYes (Specific results not detailed)

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    This document does not describe a "test set" in the context of diagnostic performance. There's no mention of patient data, images, or clinical studies with specific sample sizes. The "Performance Testing" mentioned is likely related to engineering or functional checks of the device itself (e.g., oxygen delivery rates, material strength, leakage) rather than a clinical trial with a "test set" of patients.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications

    Not applicable. The document does not describe a study involving expert review for establishing ground truth for a diagnostic output.

    4. Adjudication Method

    Not applicable. There is no diagnostic output requiring adjudication.

    5. Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    Not applicable. This device is an infant oxygen hood, not an AI or diagnostic tool where MRMC studies are typically performed.

    6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only)

    Not applicable. This device is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    Not applicable in the context of a diagnostic or AI study. The "ground truth" for this device would be its demonstrated functional capability to provide an oxygen-enriched environment safely and effectively, and its material properties meeting specifications. The comparison table essentially acts as a "ground truth" for its features compared to predicate devices.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This device is not an AI model, so there is no training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1