Search Results

The device is intended to measure the systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate (heart rate) by using an inflating cuff. The device is indicated for use with adults.

The device is an electronic blood pressure monitor. The device consists of an inflating cuff, a LCD display, a bellows sensor, an internal air pump, a leakage valve, an exhaust valve, a battery power resource, and keys for operation.

The provided document indicates that the Wristwatch Blood Pressure Monitor Model KP-7000 was evaluated for performance against the AAMI/ANSI SP10 standard.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Note: The document states compliance with AAMI/ANSI SP10 (1992 / A1:1996), which outlines specific accuracy requirements for blood pressure monitors. However, the exact numerical accuracy performance (e.g., mean difference and standard deviation of differences between the device and a reference measurement) is not explicitly detailed in this summary. The summary only provides a high-level statement of accuracy.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Sample Size: Not specified in the provided text.
• Data Provenance:
  • Country of origin: Not specified.
  • Retrospective or prospective: The phrase "a clinical trial also was performed" suggests a prospective study.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Number of Experts: Not specified.
• Qualifications of Experts: Not specified. (For blood pressure monitor validation, this typically refers to trained observers following a standardized protocol, often with mercury sphygmomanometers)

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Adjudication Method: Not specified. For blood pressure clinical trials, this usually involves a specific protocol for how multiple observers take and compare readings to establish a reference, but details are not provided here.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• MRMC Study: Not applicable. This device is a standalone blood pressure monitor, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Standalone Performance: Yes, the reported performance is for the device operating as a standalone blood pressure monitor, without human intervention in the measurement process itself, beyond initiation and placement. The AAMI/ANSI SP10 standard requires clinical validation of the device's accuracy against a reference method.

7. The type of ground truth used

• Type of Ground Truth: Clinical reference measurements, presumably obtained by trained observers using a validated reference method (e.g., auscultatory method with a mercury sphygmomanometer as per AAMI/ANSI SP10 guidelines).

8. The sample size for the training set

• Sample Size: Not applicable. This device is a traditional blood pressure monitor, not a machine learning or AI-based device that typically has a "training set." Its calibration and accuracy are based on engineering design and validation against standards rather than data-driven training.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Ground Truth Establishment for Training Set: Not applicable, as there is no "training set" for this type of device.

Ask a specific question about this device