LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K021351
    Device Name
    BIOSTEON CROSS PIN
    Manufacturer
    BIOCOMPOSITES LTD.
    Date Cleared
    2002-10-17

    (171 days)

    Product Code
    HWC
    Regulation Number
    888.3040
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Orthopedic
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K011172,K003641
    Predicate For
    K033792
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Biosteon® cross pin is indicated for use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures. The Biosteon® cross pin is used to provide suspension fixation during femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction using a soft tissue graft (semi-tendonosis gracilis).

    Device Description

    The cannulated Cross Pins are 40-60mm long by 6-9mm diameter with a conical tip 10mm long.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Biosteon Cross Pin, a medical device. The information provided heavily focuses on the device's substantial equivalence to predicate devices, particularly in materials, manufacturing, function, and indications for use.

    Based on the provided text, there is no acceptance criteria or study information related to device performance in the context of AI/ML or diagnostic accuracy. The submission is mechanical and material focused for a physical implantable device.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table and answer the questions. The provided text does not contain information about:

    • Acceptance criteria (beyond functional equivalence to a predicate device)
    • Reported device performance (in terms of sensitivity, specificity, etc.)
    • Sample sizes for test sets or data provenance (as it's not a data-driven device)
    • Number of experts or their qualifications for ground truth establishment
    • Adjudication methods
    • MRMC comparative effectiveness studies
    • Standalone algorithm performance
    • Type of ground truth (as it's not a diagnostic device)
    • Sample size for training set
    • How ground truth for the training set was established

    The document details a traditional medical device submission for a physical implant, not a software-as-a-medical-device (SaMD) or AI-powered diagnostic tool. The "acceptance criteria" for this device would have been related to mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and sterilization, which were likely demonstrated through engineering tests and material characterization, and comparison to predicate devices, rather than clinical study performance metrics or expert consensus on diagnostic accuracy.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1