Search Results

Biopsy Introducer Needles are devices that are used to guide procedural biopsy needles coaxially to the location of tissue masses or lesions located throughout the body.

Not Found

This document describes a medical device called the "Biopsy Introducer Needle" and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the Bard® TruGuide® Coaxial Needle. The information provided focuses on the intended use and biocompatibility testing of the device, rather than performance statistics derived from a study comparing its efficacy to specific acceptance criteria. This means that many of the requested elements for a study proving device acceptance criteria cannot be extracted from the provided text.

Here is an analysis based on the information available:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Based on the provided text, the acceptance criteria are not explicitly quantifiable performance metrics. Instead, "acceptance" appears to be defined by:

• Intended Use Compatibility: The device's intended use is the same as the predicate (guiding procedural biopsy needles coaxially to tissue masses/lesions).
• Performance Attributes Equivalence: The performance attributes are the same as the predicate device. However, specific quantitative attributes or their target values are not provided.
• Biocompatibility: The materials used meet the requirements of the tests and are found to be acceptable for the intended use.

Therefore, a table of specific performance acceptance criteria and numerical results cannot be constructed from this document. The "reported device performance" primarily refers to its biocompatibility:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not provided in the document. The text refers to "materials used" and "tests performed" but does not detail the sample sizes for those tests or the origin/nature of any clinical data or specific performance test sets.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not applicable/not provided. The document describes a medical device and its substantial equivalence and biocompatibility testing. It does not involve a study where experts would establish ground truth for a test set in the context of diagnostic interpretation or clinical outcomes.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not applicable/not provided. As explained above, there is no mention of a test set requiring adjudication by experts.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

There is no mention of an MRMC comparative effectiveness study, AI assistance, or human readers in this document. This device is a biopsy introducer needle, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This information is not applicable/not provided. This device is a physical medical instrument, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

As a physical device, the concept of "ground truth" in the diagnostic or AI sense does not directly apply here. The "ground truth" for the claims in this document is:

• For Intended Use & Performance Attributes: Comparison to a predicate device (Bard® TruGuide® Coaxial Needle) based on existing regulatory clearances and product specifications.
• For Biocompatibility: Conformance to the requirements of ISO 10993, Part 1, as determined by laboratory testing.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not applicable/not provided. There is no mention of a "training set" as this is not an AI/machine learning device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not applicable/not provided. As there is no training set mentioned, the method for establishing its "ground truth" is irrelevant.

Ask a specific question about this device