Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K031203
    Date Cleared
    2003-07-14

    (89 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3800
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    BIAX A.F. WRIST/BIAX ADVANCED FIXATION WRIST

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DePuy Biax A.F. Wrist System is intended to give patients limited wrist mobility by reducing pain, restoring alignment and replacing the flexion and extension movement in the wrist joint.

    The DePuy Biax A.F. Wrist System is indicated for use as a replacement of wrist joints disabled by rheumatoid arthritis with pain, deformity and/or limited motion, degenerative or post-traumatic arthrosis, ankylosis of the wrist in malposition and advanced instability with carpal destruction

    The DePuy Biax A.F. Wrist System is also indicated for revision of a failed previous wrist surgery.

    CAUTION: The DePuy Biax A.F. Wrist System is for cemented use only.

    Device Description

    The Biax A.F. Wrist System is a cemented, multiple component system to be used for the treatment, and revision, of wrist joints:
    • The radial implant stem is made of ASTM F-75 Orthochrome with an articulating surface of UHWMPe. It is available in small, medium and large sizes.
    • The 5-piece metacarpal implant is manufactured from F-75 Orthochrome and Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V ELI). It consists of a fixation plate, cemented and held in place with a central stem and two peripheral screws, and attached to an articulating head. All parts are available in a variety of sizes.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the "Biax A.F. Wrist System", a wrist prosthesis. This type of document focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device rather than presenting a performance study with acceptance criteria in the way a diagnostic AI would.

    Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them, as it relates to a diagnostic AI device.

    Specifically, it lacks details on:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods.
    3. Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies or standalone algorithm performance.
    4. Type of ground truth used (e.g., pathology, outcomes data).
    5. Sample size for the training set or how ground truth for the training set was established.

    Instead, the document primarily discusses the device's indications for use, its components, and its substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices based on identical intended use, materials, sterilization, packaging, and design features.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1