Search Results

Ask a specific question about this device

This device is intended to be used as a support for beam shaping or beam defining blocks in the delivery of external beam (photon) radiation therapy.

This device is similar in design and construction, utilizes the identical intended and performance materials, and has the same use characteristics to the predicate devices.

This appears to be a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (Beam Block Trays) from 1997. The document describes a device that supports beam shaping blocks in radiation therapy.

Based on the provided text, it is not possible to answer the detailed questions about acceptance criteria, study design, expert involvement, and AI performance.

Here's why:

• Nature of the Device: The device, "Beam Block Trays," is a physical accessory used in radiation therapy. It is not an AI/software device, a diagnostic imaging device, or a device that produces quantitative outputs that would typically have performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or AUC.
• Regulatory Context (1997 510(k)): The document is a "Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Compliance with 513(i) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act" for a 510(k) submission from 1997. At that time, AI in medical devices was virtually non-existent, and the focus of 510(k) applications, especially for accessories like this, was on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device. This typically involved showing similar materials, design, intended use, and performance characteristics, rather than conducting complex clinical trials or AI performance evaluations.
• Missing Information: The document explicitly states: "Performance standards for sheath introducers have not been established by the FDA under Section 514 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act." While this specifically mentions "sheath introducers" and not "beam block trays," it indicates the general regulatory landscape at the time: formal performance standards, as might be expected for diagnostic devices, were not typically required for many accessories. The document focuses on biocompatibility and similarity to predicate devices.

Therefore, the questions you've asked are not applicable to the provided text. The prompt's questions are designed for AI/software medical devices or devices that generate quantitative data requiring detailed statistical validation.

If you have a document for an AI-powered medical device, I would be happy to analyze it against your criteria.

Ask a specific question about this device