Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K192538
    Date Cleared
    2020-09-04

    (354 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5860
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    BD Syringe NRFit Lok and BD Syringe NRFit Slip

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The BD® Syringe NRFit™ Lok and BD® Syringe NRFit™ Slip are intended for neuraxial use by healthcare professionals for aspiration/injection of fluids.

    Device Description

    The BD® Syringe NRFit™ Lok and BD® Syringe NRFit™ Slip are sterile, single use syringes with ISO 80369-6 (NRFit™) compliant fittings. They are available in 3mL, 5mL and 10mL, lock and slip configurations and 20mL and 50mL lock configurations. The NRFit™ tips allow for connections of neuraxial specific applications while reducing the likelihood of misconnections to non-neuraxial devices. The syringe assembly consists of a lubricated polypropylene barrel with a graduated scale in milliliters (mL), a lubricated synthetic rubber stopper and a polypropylene plunger rod. The plunger rod is yellow to designate a device intended to only connect to ISO 80369-6 compatible devices such as spinal or epidural needles. The plunger rod is pulled back to aspirate fluids or depressed to inject or expel fluids.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text does not describe an AI/ML powered medical device, but rather a Becton, Dickinson and Company's (BD) Syringe NRFit Lok and BD Syringe NRFit Slip, which are medical devices that are substantially equivalent to a predicate device. Therefore, the specific details regarding acceptance criteria and studies for AI/ML performance (such as sample size for test/training sets, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance) are not applicable or present in this document.

    However, based on the provided text, the acceptance criteria and the studies performed to demonstrate equivalence of the BD Syringe NRFit™ Lok and BD Syringe NRFit™ Slip to a predicate device (BD Single Use, Hypodermic Syringe, K980987) are as follows:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    The document details numerous functional, packaging, and biocompatibility tests performed according to specific ISO and ASTM standards. The reported device performance consistently states that the subject device "met all predetermined acceptance criteria for the above-listed performance tests" or comparable phrases indicating successful adherence to the standards. Since the exact numerical criteria and results are not always explicitly stated (e.g., for stress cracking, it doesn't give a specific force value), this table will summarize the type of test and the general outcome.

    CategoryTest / CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Standard Reference)Reported Device Performance
    Functional Testing
    ConnectorsFluid leakage by Pressure DecayPer ISO 80369-6:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Subatmospheric pressure air leakagePer ISO 80369-6:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Stress crackingPer ISO 80369-6:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Resistance to separation from axial loadPer ISO 80369-6:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Resistance to separation from unscrewingPer ISO 80369-6:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Resistance to overridingPer ISO 80369-6:2016 and ISO 80369-20:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    InternalNeedle hub connectivityPer BD internal requirementsMet predetermined acceptance criteria
    Tip integrityPer BD internal requirementsMet predetermined acceptance criteria
    Dead spacePer ISO 7886-1:2017Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Volumetric accuracyPer ISO 7886-1:2017Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Maximum usable capacityPer ISO 7886-1:2017Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Plunger Retention ForcePer ISO 7886-1:2017Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    SticktionPer ISO 7886-2:1996Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Plunger Movement ForcePer ISO 7886-2:2020Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Syringe CompliancePer ISO 7886-2:2020Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Break Out Force (3ml, 5ml, 10ml, 20ml, 50ml)≤ 4 lb, ≤ 4 lb, ≤ 4.5 lb, ≤ 7.5 lb, ≤ 9.0 lb (Max @ 500mm/min)Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Sustaining force (3ml, 5ml, 10ml, 20ml, 50ml)≤ 1.5 lb, ≤ 2.0 lb, ≤ 2.0 lb, ≤ 2.5 lb, ≤ 5.0 lb (Max @ 500mm/min)Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Scale PermanencyNo Heavy Removal under solvent rubMet predetermined acceptance criteria
    Packaging Testing
    Bubble Leak TestingPer ASTM F2096:2011Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Seal Strength TestingPer ASTM F88/F88M:2015Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Microbial Barrier TestingPer ASTM F1608:2009Met predetermined acceptance criteria
    Biocompatibility
    CytotoxicityPer ISO 10993-5:2009, Non-cytotoxicNon-cytotoxic
    HemolysisPer ISO 10993-4:2017, Non-hemolyticNon-hemolytic
    Acute Systemic ToxicityPer ISO 10993-11:2006, Non-toxicNon-toxic
    Intracutaneous ReactivityPer ISO 10993-10:2010, Non-irritantNon-irritant
    SensitizationPer ISO 10993-10:2010, Non-sensitizerNon-sensitizer
    Material-mediated PyrogenicityPer ISO 10993-11:2006 and USP , Non-pyrogenicNon-pyrogenic
    LAL EndotoxinPer USP , , Met limitsMet limits
    Neurotoxicity AssessmentNo signs of systemic toxicity or neurological impairment from exposure of leachable compounds from the test articleNo signs of systemic toxicity or neurological impairment

    For the following points, as the device is a syringe and not an AI/ML powered device, these sections are generally not applicable and the provided text does not contain this information.

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
    Not applicable for this type of medical device assessment. The tests involve physical samples of the syringe rather than data sets.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
    Not applicable. Ground truth for physical device performance is established through adherence to national and international standards, rather than expert consensus on interpretive tasks.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
    Not applicable, as the evaluation is based on objective measurements against specified standard limits, not interpretive judgment.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
    The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by international and national consensus standards (ISO, ASTM, USP) that define safety and functional attributes for syringes and medical device materials, along with BD internal requirements for specific characteristics not fully covered by external standards.

    8. The sample size for the training set
    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
    Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1