Search Results

For in vitro diagnostic use in the control of ADVIA Chemistry systems for certain chemistry methods.

The Bayer Special Chemistry Controls are two separate levels of quality control material prepared from human serum with nonserum constituents added.

All the analytes currently in the control material are: Acid Phosphatase Lactate Pancreatic Amylase Lipase Cholinesterase Direct TIBC The intention of this submission is to add the assigned values to the labeling claims for: Direct TIBC

The provided text is a summary of a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device: "Bayer ADVIA Chemistry Special Chemistry Control Quality Control Material." It is important to note that this document is for a quality control material, not a diagnostic device that directly analyzes patient samples. Therefore, the typical "acceptance criteria" and "study" framework for a diagnostic device (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, clinical outcome studies) does not directly apply in the same way.

The "study" here is essentially the demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, with the addition of a new analyte, Direct TIBC, to the control material's labeling claims.

Here's an analysis of the provided information within the context of a quality control material:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

For quality control materials, acceptance criteria typically revolve around the stability and accuracy of the assigned values for the analytes. The "performance" is the successful establishment of these assigned values and the demonstration that the material functions as intended for monitoring analytical systems.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The concept of a "test set" in the context of clinical performance (like patient samples) is not directly applicable here. The "test" for this quality control material involves establishing the assigned values for the various analytes, particularly the newly added Direct TIBC.

• Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a "sample size" in relation to a patient cohort. For quality control materials, this usually refers to the number of lots or runs used to establish the target values and ranges. The document states "The intention of this submission is to add the assigned values to the labeling claims for: Direct TIBC." This implies that internal studies were conducted by Bayer to determine these assigned values experimentally.
• Data Provenance: Not specified in the document. It's internal data generated by the manufacturer during the development and validation of the quality control material. Given the manufacturer's location, the data would likely originate from their facilities (e.g., Tarrytown, NY, or Randox Laboratories in the UK). This would be prospective data generation for the purpose of establishing the control material's characteristics.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts

This type of information (number of experts, their qualifications, and adjudication) is typically relevant for studies involving subjective interpretation of patient images or complex diagnostic results. It is not applicable to the establishment of assigned values for a chemistry quality control material.

The "ground truth" for a quality control material's assigned values is established through rigorous analytical testing using reference methods or highly characterized instruments, often in multiple laboratories.

4. Adjudication Method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the Test Set

As explained above, an adjudication method in the sense of expert consensus for subjective interpretation is not applicable to this type of device and its "test set." The determination of assigned values is based on analytical measurements and statistical analysis.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This type of study is relevant for AI-powered diagnostic devices that assist human readers. This device is a quality control material for chemistry analyzers, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool. Therefore, an MRMC study is not applicable.

6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This refers to the performance of an AI algorithm without human involvement. Since this is a quality control material and not an AI algorithm, a standalone performance study in this context is not applicable.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

For a quality control material, the "ground truth" for the assigned values is established through:

• Reference Methods: Often, the performance of the control material is assessed against highly accurate reference methods or primary calibrators.
• Target Value Assignment: This typically involves running the control material on multiple analytical instruments (often of the same type for which the control is intended) over a period of time, using validated methods, and then statistically determining the mean and acceptable ranges for each analyte. This is an analytical ground truth.
• In this specific case, the "ground truth" for the added Direct TIBC would have been established by performing assays for Direct TIBC using the designated Bayer Chemistry Analyzers and statistically determining the target values and ranges for the control material levels.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

The concept of a "training set" is primarily associated with machine learning or AI algorithms. As this is a quality control material, a "training set" in that sense is not applicable.

Instead, the "development" or "characterization" of the control material involves thorough analytical testing. The "sample size" here would refer to the number of vials, lots, or analytical runs used to establish the assigned values. This information is not provided in the summary but would be part of the manufacturer's internal validation data.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

Since there is no "training set" in the AI sense for this device, how its "ground truth" (assigned values) was established is described in point 7. It involves analytical testing and characterization of the control material using accepted laboratory practices and statistical methods to determine the target values and acceptable ranges for each analyte on the intended analytical platforms.

Ask a specific question about this device