Search Results

The Arthrex Synergy UHD4 System is intended to be used as an endoscopic video camera in a variety of endoscopic surgical procedures, including but not limited to: orthopedic, laparoscopic, urologic, sinuscopic, and plastic surgical procedures. The device is also intended to be used as an accessory for microscopic surgery.

The Arthrex SynergyUHD4 System consists of a camera head with light source and a Camera Control Unit (CCU). The system is used in conjunction with an endoscope to allow for visualization onto a monitor during minimally invasive surgical procedures.

The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Arthrex Synergy UHD4 System," which is an endoscopic video camera system. This type of submission is for demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, not for proving that the device meets specific performance acceptance criteria through the kind of studies often seen for AI/ML devices.

Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and studies proving the device meets those criteria, as typically understood for an AI/ML device performance evaluation. Specifically:

• No acceptance criteria table or reported device performance for an AI/ML component is present.
• No sample sizes for test sets or data provenance are mentioned.
• No number of experts or their qualifications for ground truth establishment are detailed.
• No adjudication method is described.
• No multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study is discussed.
• No standalone (algorithm-only) performance is provided.
• No type of ground truth (e.g., pathology, outcomes data) is specified for an AI/ML model.
• No sample size for a training set is mentioned.
• No method for establishing ground truth for a training set is provided.

Instead, the document focuses on demonstrating that the Arthrex Synergy UHD4 System is "substantially equivalent" to an existing predicate device (K071756: Endohub-1.0 Endoscopic Video Camera with Video Capture). The evidence for this substantial equivalence is described as:

• Bench testing: "Bench testing was performed to demonstrate equivalence to the predicate regarding environmental conditions, power requirements, image capture, and video output and resolution."
• Sterilization and electrical safety validations: These were "performed on the system components and comply with ISO 17665-1 and IEC 60601-1:2012 3rd Edition."

The core objective of this 510(k) submission is to show that "Any differences between the Arthrex SynergyUHD4 System and the predicates are considered minor and do not raise questions concerning safety and effectiveness. There are no significant differences between the new device and predicate that raise issues of safety or effectiveness."

In summary, the provided text describes a 510(k) submission for an endoscopic video camera system, not an AI/ML enabled device, and thus does not contain the specific performance study information requested.

Ask a specific question about this device