Search Results

The Arthrex SutureTape is intended for use in soft tissue approximation and/or ligation. The suture may be provided individually or be incorporated as a component, into surgeries where constructs including those with allograft tissues are used for repair.

The Arthrex SutureTape is comprised of non-absorbable sutures made of a polyblend of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) and polyester yarns but may also include nylon yarns.

The Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape is a 0.9 mm-wide tape suture with a round braided suture tail that is smaller than the tape portion. The tape and tail portion of the suture are implantable while the suture tail is not intended to be knotted. The flat tape portion of the Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape suture meets or exceeds USP performance standards for knot pull tensile strength for size 2 non-absorbable surgical sutures. The suture tail portions of the Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape suture meet the performance standards for USP 2-0 non-absorbable surgical suture, except for an oversize in diameter.

The Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape is supplied sterile, in pre-cut lengths, in various loop configurations, and in some cases, with various swaged needles and with stiffened ends. The Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape is available non-dyed, dyed, and fully or partially striped. Dyes may include D&C Blue No. 6 and Logwood Black. Suture strands that are dyed with Logwood black are made of nylon. Additional material for the Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape includes cyanoacrylate.

This document describes the 510(k) premarket notification for the Arthrex SutureTape, specifically the K221354 submission for the 0.9 mm SutureTape as a line extension. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a study proving performance against acceptance criteria for a new type of AI/medical imaging device.

Therefore, many of the requested elements (e.g., sample size for test set, data provenance, number of experts, adjudication method, MRMC study, standalone performance, ground truth for test and training sets) are not applicable to this type of regulatory submission because it's a materials science and mechanical performance comparison for a medical device (suture), not an AI/imaging diagnostic device.

However, I can extract the relevant "acceptance criteria" and "reported device performance" based on the provided text, focusing on the mechanical and performance standards for sutures.

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance for Arthrex SutureTape

This submission (K221354) is for a line extension of the Arthrex SutureTape device, specifically the 0.9 mm SutureTape. The "proof" of meeting acceptance criteria is demonstrated through mechanical performance testing against established USP (United States Pharmacopeia) standards for surgical sutures and comparison to a legally marketed predicate device (K171296: Arthrex SutureTape).

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not specify the exact sample sizes (N numbers) for the mechanical performance tests (tensile strength, BET). It states that "representative samples" were used for the Bacterial Endotoxins Test. The data provenance is implied to be from internal testing conducted by Arthrex Inc., a U.S.-based company. The studies are prospective in the sense that they are conducted specifically for this regulatory submission to demonstrate compliance.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

This is not applicable. Ground truth for mechanical devices like sutures is established through standardized laboratory testing (e.g., USP methods) rather than expert consensus on diagnostic images.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This is not applicable. No human adjudication is involved in evaluating the mechanical properties of a suture.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This is not applicable. This submission is for a surgical suture, not an AI or imaging diagnostic device.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This is not applicable. This is not an algorithmic device.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used for performance evaluation is USP (United States Pharmacopeia) performance standards for surgical sutures and comparison to the mechanical and physical properties of a legally marketed predicate device. This is a form of objective, standardized laboratory measurement rather than clinical outcomes or expert consensus.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

This is not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

This is not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training set.

Summary of the Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:

The study proving the Arthrex 0.9 mm SutureTape meets acceptance criteria is primarily a series of bench tests and laboratory evaluations designed to demonstrate that the device's mechanical properties and safety aspects (like pyrogenicity) conform to well-established industry standards (USP) and are substantially equivalent to a pre-existing, legally marketed predicate device. The key performance indicators evaluated were:

• Knot pull tensile strength of the flat tape portion.
• Tensile strength of the braided suture tail portion.
• Needle pull tensile strength of any attached needles.
• Bacterial Endotoxins Test (BET) for pyrogenicity.

The conclusion is that "Any differences between the proposed and predicate devices are considered minor and do not raise questions concerning safety or effectiveness," and based on "technological characteristics, and the tensile test data submitted, Arthrex Inc. has determined that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to the currently marketed predicate device." This demonstrates that the new line extension performs as expected for its intended use as a surgical suture.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Arthrex SutureTape is intended for use in soft tissue approximation and or ligation. These sutures may be incorporated, as components, into surgeries where constructs including those with allograft tissues are used for repair.

Arthrex SutureTape is a suture made of Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) and polyester, and may include nylon. The proposed suture is braided flat with round ends, and is available in precut lengths in straight and loop configurations, and with or without needles. Arthrex SutureTape is packaged sterile for single use. New colorant additives meet the requirements of 21 CFR 73.1015 and 21 CFR 74.3054.

The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA for a medical device called "Arthrex SutureTape." This document details the regulatory clearance for a surgical suture and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared devices.

Crucially, this document does not describe acceptance criteria for an AI/ML-based device or a study proving that an AI/ML device meets such criteria. It pertains to a physical medical device (suture) and its mechanical and biocompatibility testing. Therefore, I cannot extract the information required to answer your prompt regarding acceptance criteria and study details for an AI/ML device.

The information you are asking for, such as sample size for a test set, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, types of ground truth, and training set details, are specific to the validation of AI/ML systems, particularly in medical imaging or diagnostic contexts. This document is about a surgical suture.

Ask a specific question about this device