Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K212378
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2022-02-23

    (205 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Arsenal Ankle Plating System

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Arsenal Ankle Plating System is intended for use in trauma and reconstructive procedures of the small bones in the hand/foot, ankle, distal tibia, fibula, and other bones appropriate for the size of the device.

    Device Description

    The Arsenal Ankle Plating System consists of plates of various shapes and sizes composed of implant grade titanium alloy intended for use in trauma and reconstructive procedures of the small bones in the hand/foot, ankle, distal tibia, fibula, and other bones appropriate for the size of the device. The system incorporates multiple locking and nonlocking screws of various lengths and diameters, washers, and the necessary instruments to facilitate the placement of these implants.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the premarket notification (510(k)) for the Arsenal Ankle Plating System. It is a medical device and not an AI/ML powered device, so the information requested to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria is not applicable in the context of an AI/ML powered device. The document refers to non-clinical testing for mechanical safety and performance characteristics, but does not pertain to AI/ML model performance.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and study details as they relate to AI/ML powered devices.

    However, I can extract the information provided about the non-clinical tests performed for this medical device, which are analogous to proving the device meets its acceptance criteria for mechanical and material properties:

    Non-Clinical Test Summary (Analogous to Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria for Mechanical Properties):

    The following tests were performed for the Arsenal Ankle Plating System:

    • Single Cycle Bend Testing: Referencing ASTM F382.
    • Axial Pullout Strength Testing: Referencing ASTM F543 and Guidance for Industry & Food and Drug Administration Staff for Orthopedic Non-Spinal Metallic Bone Screws and Washers - Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway.
    • Torsional Property Testing: Referencing ASTM F543 and Guidance for Industry & Food and Drug Administration Staff for Orthopedic Non-Spinal Metallic Bone Screws and Washers - Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway.
    • Driving Torque Testing: Referencing ASTM F543 and Guidance for Industry & Food and Drug Administration Staff for Orthopedic Non-Spinal Metallic Bone Screws and Washers - Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway.
    • Sterilization Testing: Referencing ISO 17665-1:2006 and AAMI TIR30:2011.
    • Biocompatibility Testing: Referencing ISO 10993-1.

    Additionally, an engineering analysis was conducted for the plates to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate devices. The results of these evaluations indicated that the Arsenal Ankle Plating System is equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of mechanical safety and performance.

    Not Applicable Information (for AI/ML powered devices):

    The following points are not applicable to the Arsenal Ankle Plating System as it is a traditional medical device, not an AI/ML powered one:

    • A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance (in terms of AI metrics).
    • Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance.
    • Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and qualifications.
    • Adjudication method for the test set.
    • If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done.
    • If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done.
    • The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc).
    • The sample size for the training set.
    • How the ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1