Search Results

The Aero Jet Ventilation Catheter is indicated to be used as a device for ventilating the patient by the administration of oxygen and air, a technique referred to as jet ventilation.

The Aero Jet Ventilation Catheter is a sterile, single-use, prescription medical device that consists of a three lumen PTFE extrusion, a PEBAX centering feature at the distal end, three (3) MABS female luer connectors, silicone extrusion to connect the connectors to the main shaft, and four (4) polyolefin color coded marker bands for identification of connectors and depth marking. A removable stainless-steel stylet is included to support the device during insertion. It has a nominal insertion length of 23 cm and nominal OD of 3.85 mm. It is inserted orally and placed subglottic. It provides jet ventilation and allows for monitoring of pressure and EtCO2.

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device called the "Aero Jet Ventilation Catheter." 510(k) clearances are for demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not for proving new claims of safety and effectiveness through clinical trials with strict acceptance criteria based on new performance metrics.

Therefore, the provided document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria in the way described in the prompt (e.g., related to AI/algorithm performance, MRMC studies, specific effect sizes, ground truth establishment, or sample sizes for test/training sets in the context of diagnostic/AI performance).

The "performance testing summary" in the document refers to standard engineering and biocompatibility tests to show the device functions as intended and is safe, similar to the predicate device. It is not a study to establish performance against specific clinical or diagnostic metrics with human readers or AI in the way implied by the prompt's detailed questions.

Based on the provided text, I cannot complete the table or answer the questions as they pertain to a study proving device performance against acceptance criteria in a clinical/diagnostic context (like an AI study). The 510(k) process for this device relies on demonstrating equivalence to an existing device, primarily through engineering and bench testing, not through comparative clinical studies as you've outlined for diagnostic/AI devices.

Here's what I can extract from the document regarding "acceptance criteria" in the context of a 510(k) submission for this type of medical device:

The acceptance criteria for a 510(k) submission for a device like the Aero Jet Ventilation Catheter are implicitly tied to demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device. This typically involves showing:

• Same Indications for Use: The new device is intended for the same uses as the predicate.
• Same Technological Characteristics: The new device has similar design, materials, and operating principles.
• Differences Do Not Raise New Questions of Safety/Effectiveness: If there are differences, testing must show they do not negatively impact safety or effectiveness.

The "studies" performed are primarily non-clinical functional and performance testing alongside biocompatibility testing. These tests are designed to show that the device performs its intended mechanical functions reliably and safely, and interacts biocompatibly with the body, similar to the predicate.

Therefore, the table and answers below reflect the type of "acceptance criteria" and "proof" found in this specific 510(k) document, which differs significantly from criteria for AI/diagnostic performance studies.

Acceptance Criteria & Device Performance (Based on K243579)

Since this is a 510(k) for a physical medical catheter, the "acceptance criteria" are not focused on diagnostic accuracy or AI performance, but rather on physical and functional characteristics to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device. The "performance" is implicitly tied to meeting these engineering and biocompatibility standards.

Table of Acceptance Criteria and the Reported Device Performance

Ask a specific question about this device