Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K171761
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2018-01-16

    (216 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    874.4180
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ACCLARENT AERA Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System is intended to dilate the Eustachian tube for treatment of persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients ages 18 and older.

    Device Description

    The ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System includes a Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter and Guide Catheter designed specifically for use in accessing and dilating the Eustachian Tube. The system is used with the following additional devices: the ACCLARENT® SE Inflation Device (or ACCLARENT® Balloon Inflation Device). The ACCLARENT® SE Inflation Device or ACCLARENT® Balloon Inflation Device is used to inflate the balloon. All devices are provided sterile for single-patient use.

    The ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System includes is a 6x16mm (inflated diameter x length) flexible Balloon Catheter with an integrated shaft and a nylon balloon at the distal tip. The non-compliant balloon is designed to dilate the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube. The shaft consists of dual lumen tubing with an actuator component that is designed to assist in rotation and advancement of the balloon catheter. The balled catheter tip (aka, “blueberry tip") on the balloon catheter is designed to restrict advancement of the device into the bony portion of the Eustachian tube, known as the isthmus. There is an endoscopic marker placed at the proximal taper of the balloon to aid in positioning under direct endoscopic visualization.

    The AERA Guide Catheter is anatomically designed to facilitate AERA Balloon Catheter access to the Eustachian tube. The AERA Guide Catheter incorporates an atraumatic distal tip and distal angled tip profile that facilitates access to the Eustachian tube. The Guide Catheter supplied with the ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System contains a lubricious inner liner to allow smooth passage for the balloon catheter and includes a hypotube for rigidity.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System, based on the provided document:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The provided document focuses on the substantial equivalence of the device and does not explicitly list specific numerical acceptance criteria for clinical performance (e.g., target success rates, symptom improvement percentages). Instead, the performance data section describes meeting acceptance criteria for various bench tests related to device integrity and safety.

    Acceptance Criteria CategoryReported Device Performance
    Bench Testing
    Dimensional AttributesMet all acceptance criteria
    Cycle FatigueMet all acceptance criteria
    Balloon BurstMet all acceptance criteria
    Bond SeparationMet all acceptance criteria
    BiocompatibilityTesting has shown the device is biocompatible
    SterilizationValidated per AAMI/ANSI/ISO 11135:2014, achieving a sterility assurance level of 10^-6
    Ethylene Oxide ResidualsMet ISO 10993-7:2008 requirements
    Packaging Shelf LifeEstablished at one year via accelerated aging per ASTM F1980-07

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Test Set (Clinical Data):
      • The document references "real-world clinical data collected from 25 patients from two sites."
      • Data Provenance: The document cites a publication by Luukkainen et al. (2017) regarding the feasibility of balloon Eustachian tuboplasty under local anesthesia. One of the authors, Rautiainen M, is from Finland (based on a quick search for the publication reference, not explicitly stated in the provided text). It's likely this smaller clinical data set is retrospective or a case series/pilot observational study, given the description as "real-world clinical data" supporting use under local/topical anesthetic. The document does not describe a formal, large-scale clinical trial used as a "test set" for the purpose of establishing primary effectiveness or safety endpoints in a randomized controlled manner.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    • The document does not specify the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing ground truth for the 25-patient clinical data set. The clinical data appears to be observational and intended to support the feasibility of the device under certain anesthetic conditions rather than being a formal "test set" with pre-defined ground truth established by experts for performance evaluation.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • No adjudication method is described for the 25-patient clinical data.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done

    • No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not explicitly mentioned or described in the provided document. The device is a medical device for dilation, not an imaging or diagnostic AI tool where MRMC studies are typically performed.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • This question is not applicable. The ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or AI system. Its performance is evaluated through bench testing, biocompatibility, sterilization, and then clinical use with human operators.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    • For Bench Testing: The "ground truth" for bench testing would be predefined engineering specifications, material properties, and regulatory standards (e.g., dimensional tolerances, burst pressure limits, sterilization efficacy, biocompatibility assay results).
    • For Clinical Data (25 patients): The clinical data from the 25 patients likely relied on clinical endpoints, such as resolution of Eustachian tube dysfunction symptoms, patency of the Eustachian tube, or patient satisfaction, as assessed by the treating physicians. The document does not detail how "ground truth" was established for these clinical outcomes in this specific dataset.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    • This question is not applicable as the ACCLARENT AERA® Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System is a physical medical device, not an AI model requiring a "training set" in the computational sense.
    • The document mentions that the device has "expanded indications for use" and that "additional clinical testing was not required to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the device" because it is substantially equivalent to predicate devices. This indicates that prior clinical data from the predicate devices and existing literature inform its use, rather than a new "training set" for an algorithm.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

    • This question is not applicable for the reasons stated in point 8.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    DEN150056
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2016-09-16

    (284 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    874.4180
    Type
    Direct
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Acclarent Aera Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The ACCLARENT AERATM Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System is intended to dilate the Eustachian tube for treatment of persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction in adults ages 22 and older.

    Device Description

    The ACCLARENT® AERA™ Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation System includes the Eustachian Tube Balloon Catheter (ETBC) and the Eustachian Tube Guide Catheter (ETGC). The system is provided with the following additional devices: the Acclarent SE Inflation Device (or Acclarent Balloon Inflation Device) and Relieva Extension Tubing. The Acclarent SE Inflation Device (or Acclarent Balloon Inflation Device) is used to inflate the ETBC. The Acclarent SE Inflation Device and Acclarent Balloon Inflation Device are FDA cleared devices (K150172 and K052198, respectively). The Relieva Extension Tubing may be used to connect the Balloon Catheters and the Inflation Device when additional tubing length is required. The Relieva Extension Tubing is a Class I exempt device under 21 CFR 874.4420. All devices are provided sterile for single-patient use.

    The ETBC is a 6x16mm (inflated diameter x length) flexible Balloon Catheter (Figure 1) with an integrated shaft and a nylon balloon at the distal tip. The non-compliant balloon is designed to dilate the cartilaginous portion of the Eustachian tube (ET). The shaft consists of dual lumen tubing with an actuator component that is designed to assist in rotation and advancement of the ETBC. The balled catheter tip (aka, "blueberry tip") on the ETBC is designed to restrict advancement of the device into the bony portion of the ET, known as the isthmus. There is an endoscopic marker placed at the proximal taper of the balloon to aid in positioning under direct endoscopic visualization.

    The ETGC (Figure 2) is designed to facilitate ETBC access to the ET. The ETGC incorporates an atraumatic distal tip and distal angled tip profile that facilitates access to the ET. The ETGC contains a lubricious inner liner to allow smooth passage for the ETBC and includes a hypotube for rigidity.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them, based on the provided text:

    ACCLARENT AERA™ EUSTACHIAN TUBE BALLOON DILATION SYSTEM

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The provided text details various non-clinical/bench studies and a clinical study that demonstrate the device's performance against specific criteria.

    Non-Clinical/Bench Studies Acceptance Criteria and Performance:

    Test NameAcceptance CriteriaReported Performance
    Biocompatibility
    CytotoxicityAcceptable per ISO 10993-5:2009Accepted
    SensitizationAcceptable per ISO 10993-10:2010Accepted
    IrritationAcceptable per ISO 10993-10:2010Accepted
    Acute Systemic ToxicityAcceptable per ISO 10993-11:2006Accepted
    Sterilization & Shelf Life
    Sterilization ValidationSterility assurance level (SAL) of 10^-6Passed
    Ethylene Oxide ResidualsEthylene oxide (EO) redacted (b(4) CCI)Passed
    Tensile StrengthForce at break ≥ redacted (b(4) CCI)Passed
    Balloon Catheter Tip TestForce at break ≥ redacted (b(4) CCI)Passed
    Insertion/Retraction TestAfter 4 insertion/retractions without structural damage or balloon leakagePassed
    Fatigue Test8 cycles @ redacted (b(4) CCI) without failurePassed
    LabelVisual confirmation of correct labelPassed
    Guide Catheter Performance
    DimensionalPer device design specificationsPassed
    FatigueAfter 4 insertion/retraction cycles without failurePassed
    MaterialsVisual confirmation that materials are clear/translucent for visibilityPassed
    TorqueTorque ≥ redacted (b(4) CCI)Passed
    Tensile StrengthForce at break ≥ redacted (b(4) CCI)Passed
    LabelVisual confirmation of correct labelPassed

    Cadaver Study Acceptance Criteria and Performance:

    Test NameAcceptance CriteriaReported Performance
    Simulated Use in Cadavers (Overall Performance)Clinically acceptable rating of "2" or higher on a 1-4 point scale (4 = excellent, 1 = clinically unacceptable)All ratings from each evaluator were above "2". The lowest average rating for any requirement was 3.3, and the highest was 3.7 out of 4. System performed as intended with no safety issues.

    Clinical Study Acceptance Criteria and Performance:

    EndpointAcceptance CriteriaReported Performance
    Primary EfficacySuperiority of ET balloon dilation + medical management vs. medical management alone, demonstrated by a significantly higher proportion of subjects experiencing normalization of tympanometry at 6 weeks post-treatment.Tympanogram normalization observed in 51.8% (73/141) of investigational subjects vs. 13.9% (10/72) controls (p
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1