Search Results
Found 4 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(266 days)
Access hsTnI
Access hsTnI is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels in human serum and plasma using the Unicel DxI Immunoassay Systems to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
The Access hsTnI is a two–site immunoenzymatic ("sandwich") assay. Monoclonal anti–cTnI antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase is added to a reaction vessel along with a surfactant–containing buffer and sample. After a short incubation, paramagnetic particles coated with monoclonal anti–cTnI antibody are added. The human cTnI binds to the anti–cTnI antibody on the solid phase, while the anti–cTnI antibody–alkaline phosphatase conjugate reacts with different antigenic sites on the cTnI molecules. After incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Analyte concentration is automatically determined from a stored calibration.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Access hsTnI device, based on the provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria Category | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance (Access hsTnI Candidate on UniCel DxI 800) |
---|---|---|
Method Comparison | Slope of Passing-Bablok linear regression model: 1.00 ± 0.10 | Met acceptance criteria (exact slope not provided, but stated that the study "met the acceptance criteria of slope 1.00 ± 0.10"). Bias data supported that reference intervals have not changed appreciably from the commercialized product. |
Imprecision | Within-laboratory (total) CV: ≤ 10% for concentrations ≥ 11.5 pg/mL | |
Within-laboratory (total) SD: ≤ 1.15 pg/mL for concentrations 0.05). If significant, the fit of the polynomial regression demonstrating significance should have ≤ 10% bias across the analytical measuring range. | The analysis of the data found that across the UniCel DxI 800 instruments, and for each sample concentration range, the higher order (2nd or 3rd) term of the polynomial fit is non-significant (p > 0.05), and if significant, the fit of the polynomial regression demonstrating significance had ≤ 10% bias across the analytical measuring range. | |
LoB/LoD | Not explicitly stated as an "acceptance criteria" but limits are reported for the predicate. | LoB estimate of the Access hsTnI is 1.5 (serum and plasma). |
LoD estimate of the Access hsTnI is 1.8 (serum and plasma). | ||
LoQ | Not explicitly stated as an "acceptance criteria" but limits are reported for the predicate. | The LoQ for Access hsTnI at ≤20% within-lab CV was determined to be 1.3 pg/mL (serum) and 1.2 pg/mL (plasma). |
Carryover | Not explicitly stated as an "acceptance criteria" for numeric limits, but the sponsor performed studies and included a limitation in labeling acknowledging observed carryover. | When a sample with cTnI > 150,000 pg/mL (ng/L) was tested, intra-assay carryover was observed if an Access hsTnI was tested after a high cTnI sample. Estimated carryover was 3-5 pg/mL (ng/L) from a high sample at 270,000 pg/mL (ng/L) and 5-8 pg/mL (ng/L) from a high sample at 500,000 pg/mL (ng/L). Limitation statements related to carryover are to be added. |
Analytical Measuring Range | 2.3 pg/mL to 27,027 pg/mL (Predicate) | Similar (Candidate) |
Study Details
The provided document describes a study primarily focused on demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the Access hsTnI assay when run on the UniCel DxI 800 Immunoassay System compared to its predicate device (Access hsTnI on the Access 2 Immunoassay System). This is achieved through performance testing of various analytical aspects.
-
Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Method Comparison: 239 samples (119 Lithium Heparin Plasma and 120 Serum).
- Data Provenance: Not specified (e.g., country of origin). The document indicates it's a retrospective comparison between the "IVD Access hsTnI (Current Assay Protocol File (APF))" and the "proposed Access hsTnI (Proposed APF)" on the UniCel DxI 800 instruments, implying existing samples or previously collected data.
-
Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
- Not Applicable. This device is an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) immunoassay for quantitative determination of cTnI levels. The "ground truth" for the test set in this context refers to the measured cTnI values, which are inherently quantitative and determined by the predicate device's method and the proposed device's method, not by expert consensus or interpretation of images/clinical findings.
-
Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- Not Applicable. As noted above, this is a quantitative analytical method comparison, not a diagnostic interpretation or clinical outcome study that would require adjudication.
-
If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance:
- Not Applicable. This is an in-vitro diagnostic device, not an AI-based image interpretation or diagnostic aid system involving human readers.
-
If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done:
- Yes, implicitly. The studies described (Method Comparison, Imprecision, Linearity, LoB/LoD, LoQ, Carryover) evaluate the performance of the analytical instrument and assay without human intervention in the measurement process. The device itself is an automated immunoassay system that produces quantitative results.
-
The Type of Ground Truth Used:
- The "ground truth" in this context refers to the quantitative measurements of cTnI levels themselves. For the method comparison, the predicate device (Access hsTnI on the Access 2 Immunoassay System, or the "Current Assay Protocol File (APF)" on the DxI 800) essentially serves as the reference for comparison against the "Proposed APF" on the UniCel DxI 800. Therefore, it's a comparison against an established, legally marketed reference measurement method.
-
The Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not specified. This documentation primarily focuses on the validation of the device's analytical performance. While there would have been internal development and optimization (which could be considered "training"), the document does not distinguish a formal "training set" (as might be seen with AI/ML models) from "internal validation" data. The tested datasets described are for analytical validation.
-
How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
- Not specified / Not applicable in the traditional sense. As an IVD assay, the "ground truth" for developing such a test is the accurate quantitative measurement of the analyte (cTnI) in biological samples, requiring highly controlled reference methods and materials. The document indicates the device's principle is a "two-site immunoenzymatic ('sandwich') assay," which is a well-established biochemical technique. The development process would involve extensive characterization against reference standards and known concentrations, rather than establishing ground truth through, for example, expert labeling of clinical data.
Ask a specific question about this device
(266 days)
Access hsTnI
Access hsTnI is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels in human serum and plasma using the Access 2 Immunoassay Analyzers to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
The Access hsTnI assay is a two–site immunoenzymatic ("sandwich") assay. Monoclonal anti–cTnI antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase is added to a reaction vessel along with a surfactant–containing buffer and sample. After a short incubation, paramagnetic particles coated with monoclonal anti–cTnI antibody are added. The human cTnI binds to the anti–cTnI antibody on the solid phase, while the anti–cTnI antibody–alkaline phosphatase conjugate reacts with different antigenic sites on the cTnI molecules. After incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Analyte concentration is automatically determined from a stored calibration.
The provided text describes the 510(k) clearance for the Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI device, specifically focusing on demonstrating its equivalence when run on the DxC 500i Clinical Analyzer compared to the previously cleared Access 2 Immunoassay System. The "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in this context refer to the analytical performance characteristics required to show substantial equivalence between the new platform (DxC 500i) and the cleared predicate platform (Access 2) for the Access hsTnI assay.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Performance Parameter | Acceptance Criteria (New DxC 500i vs. Predicate Access 2 for Access hsTnI) | Reported Device Performance (Access hsTnI on DxC 500i) |
---|---|---|
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Serum) | ||
Slope (Passing-Bablok) | Slope 1.00 ± 0.10 | 1.001 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Serum) | ||
Slope 95% CI | N/A (implied by slope criteria) | 0.976 – 1.020 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Serum) | ||
Intercept (pg/mL) | N/A | -0.184 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Serum) | ||
Correlation Coefficient (r) | N/A (implied by clinical performance criteria for r) | 0.999 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Plasma) | ||
Slope (Passing-Bablok) | Slope 1.00 ± 0.10 | 0.997 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Plasma) | ||
Slope 95% CI | N/A (implied by slope criteria) | 0.978 – 1.016 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Plasma) | ||
Intercept (pg/mL) | N/A | 0.560 |
Platform Equivalency (Method Comparison - Plasma) | ||
Correlation Coefficient (r) | N/A (implied by clinical performance criteria for r) | 0.999 |
Clinical Performance (Method Comparison) | ||
Slope | 1.00 ± 0.10 | Met the acceptance criteria (specific value not reported, but stated to be within range) |
Clinical Performance (Method Comparison) | ||
Correlation Coefficient (r) | ≥ 0.90 | Met the acceptance criteria (specific value not reported, but stated to be within range) |
**Imprecision (Total within-laboratory) for levels 1,000,000 pg/mL sample |
Note: The acceptance criteria for the "Platform Equivalency" and "Clinical Performance" studies are largely the same (slope 1.00 ± 0.10 and r ≥ 0.90), indicating the central intent was to show the DxC 500i performs equivalently to the Access 2 for this assay.
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Platform Equivalency Study (Method Comparison - Representative) Sample Size:
- Serum: N = 106
- Plasma: N = 122
- Clinical Performance (Method Comparison) Sample Size:
- "More than 200 discrete lithium heparin plasma samples" per site for a total of three sites (2 external, 1 internal). This implies a total sample size of >600 for this specific study.
- Imprecision, Linearity, Detection Capability, and Carryover studies: Sample sizes are not explicitly stated for these, but they are implied to be sufficient for the CLSI standards cited (EP05-A3, EP06-2nd Edition, EP17-A2).
- Data Provenance: The studies were conducted at "two external tests sites and one internal test site." The specific country of origin is not mentioned, but "Beckman Coulter, Inc." is based in California, USA. The data is prospective as it involves controlled studies and analyses to demonstrate performance on the new platform.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
This section is Not Applicable to this device. The Access hsTnI assay is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) test that quantitatively measures a biomarker (cardiac troponin I). The "ground truth" for method comparison and analytical performance studies of IVDs is typically established by comparative analysis against a reference method or a legally marketed predicate device, as seen here. It does not involve human expert interpretation of images or signals that would require expert consensus for ground truth.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This section is Not Applicable. As stated above, this is an IVD device for quantitative measurement. The "test set" in this context refers to patient samples with varying concentrations of the analyte, measured by both the candidate and predicate devices. There is no human interpretation or subjective assessment that would require adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This section is Not Applicable. The device is a quantitative immunoassay, not an AI-powered diagnostic imaging or interpretation tool that assists human readers. Therefore, an MRMC study is not relevant.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This section is Not Applicable in the context of an "algorithm only" being evaluated for standalone performance. The Access hsTnI device on the DxC 500i is a laboratory instrument system performing a chemical assay. Its "performance" is inherently "standalone" in the sense that the instrument provides a quantitative result without immediate human-in-the-loop assistance for that specific measurement. The "comparison testing" essentially evaluates its standalone performance against a predicate standalone device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the test set was essentially:
- Measurement by the legally marketed predicate device (Access hsTnI on Access 2 Immunoassay System): This is the gold standard against which the performance of the Access hsTnI on the DxC 500i Clinical Analyzer is compared to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
- Definitions within CLSI guidelines: For parameters like precision, linearity, and detection capability, the "ground truth" is adherence to statistical and analytical performance models defined by the specified CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This section is Not Applicable. The Access hsTnI is a reagent and instrument system for an immunoassay. It is not an AI/ML algorithm that requires "training data" in the typical sense. The term "training set" is usually associated with machine learning models. The development and validation of such IVD assays involve extensive R&D, method development, and verification on an internal set of samples, but these are not referred to as a "training set" in the context of AI.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
This section is Not Applicable for the reasons stated in point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
(452 days)
Access hsTnI
Access hsTnI is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnl) levels in human serum and plasma using the DxI Access Immunoassay Analyzers to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
The Access hsTnl assay is a sandwich immunoenzymatic assay. The Access hsTnl assay consists of the reagent pack and calibrators. Other items needed to run the assay include substrate and wash buffer. The Access hsTnl reagent pack, Access hsTnl calibrators, along with the UniCel Dxl Wash Buffer II are designed for use with the Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer in a clinical laboratory setting.
The provided text describes the Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI device, a chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). The information below summarizes the acceptance criteria and the study used to prove the device meets these criteria.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Clinical Performance (Method Comparison) | Slope 1.00 ± 0.10 (compared to predicate) | Met, supporting equivalence of Access hsTnI on Dxl 9000 to Access hsTnI on Dxl 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer for plasma and serum samples. |
Imprecision | ≤ 10% within-laboratory CV for concentrations ≥ 11.5 pg/mL; ≤ 1.15 pg/mL within-laboratory SD for concentrations |
Ask a specific question about this device
(270 days)
Access hsTnI
Access hsTnI is a paramagnetic particle, chemiluminescent immunoassay for the quantitative determination of cardiac troponin I (cTnl) levels in human serum and plasma using the Access 2 Immunoassay Systems to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI).
The Access hsTnI is a two-site immunoenzymatic ("sandwich") assay. Monoclonal anti-cTnl antibody coniugated to alkaline phosphatase is added to a reaction vessel along with a surfactant-containing buffer and sample. After a short incubation, paramagnetic particles coated with monoclonal anti-cTnl antibody are added. The human cTnl binds to the anti-cTnl antibody on the solid phase, while the anti-cTnl antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate reacts with different antigenic sites on the cTnl molecules. After incubation, materials bound to the solid phase are held in a magnetic field while unbound materials are washed away. Then, the chemiluminescent substrate is added to the vessel and light generated by the reaction is measured with a luminometer. The light production is directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample. Analyte concentration is automatically determined from a stored calibration.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study details for the Access hsTnI device, based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Parameter | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate) | Reported Device Performance (Candidate) |
---|---|---|
Precision | ≤ 10% within-laboratory CV for concentrations ≥ 11.5 pg/mL ≤ 1.15 pg/mL within laboratory SD for concentrations 0.05), or if significant, bias ≤ 10% across the analytical measuring range. | |
LoB (Limit of Blank) | Not explicitly stated as a numerical criterion in the "Predicate" column. | 0.6 pg/mL |
LoD (Limit of Detection) | Not explicitly stated as a numerical criterion in the "Predicate" column. | 1.0 pg/mL (serum) and 0.6 pg/mL (plasma) |
LoQ (Limit of Quantitation) | Not explicitly stated as a numerical criterion in the "Predicate" column. | 0.8 pg/mL (serum) and 0.7 pg/mL (plasma) at ≤20% within-lab CV |
Carryover | Not explicitly stated as a numerical criterion in the "Predicate" column. | ≥ 95% of maximum individual replicate carryover events |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1