Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K133627
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2013-12-23

    (27 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    886.5925
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    AVAIRA SPHERIC AND TORIC (ENFILCON A) SOFT CONTACT LENS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    AVAIRA (enfilcon A) SPHERE Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lenses are indicated for the correction of ametropia (myopia and hyperopia) in aphakic and non-aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes. The lenses may be worn by persons who exhibit astigmatism of 2.00 diopters or less that does not interfere with visual acuity.

    AVAIRA (enfilcon A) TORIC Soft (Hydrophilic) Contact Lenses are indicated for the correction of visual ametropia (myopia or hyperopia with astigmatism) in aphakic and non-aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes in powers from -20.00 to +20.00 diopters and astigmatic corrections from -0.25 to -10.00 diopters.

    DAILY DISPOSABLE:

    The AVAIRA (enfilcon A) Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lenses are indicated for single-use disposable wear.

    FREQUENT REPLACEMENT:

    The AVAIRA (enfilcon A) Soft (hydrophilic) Contact Lenses are indicated for daily wear. When prescribed for planned replacement the lens may be disinfected using a chemical or hydrogen peroxide disinfecting system.

    Device Description

    The Avaira (enfilcon A) soft contact lens is a daily wear silicone hydrogel contact lens that is not surface treated and is characterized by a high oxygen permeability (Dk). The lens material, enfilcon A, is composed of silicone macromers cross linked with other monomers, incorporating phthalocyanine blue as an integrated handling tint. A UV blocker is added to reduce the amount of ultraviolet light transmitted into the eye. The Avaira (enfilcon A) Soft (hydrophilic) contact lenses are a hemispherical shell. This 510(k) submission covers a process modification to add a step to the preparation of the monomer mixture. The physical properties and dimensions of the finished lenses are unchanged from predicate 510(k)s.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the acceptance criteria and the study conducted for the CooperVision AVAIRA (enfilcon A) Sphere and Toric Contact Lenses.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    Tested CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Implied: "Same as predicate" or within acceptable range)Reported Device Performance (Results)
    Refractive Index1.40 (Predicate)Pass
    Total ExtractablesNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    Monomer ResidualsNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    IonofluxNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    Contact AngleNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    UV TransmissionNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    ModulusNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    ElongationNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    Tensile StrengthNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    Power ConformanceNot explicitly stated, implied to be within acceptable rangePass
    For Substantial Equivalence Comparison (showing alignment with predicate devices):
    Indications for Use (Sphere)Correction of ametropia in aphakic and non-aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes and astigmatism ≤2.00 dioptersSame
    Indications for Use (Toric)Correction of ametropia (myopia or hyperopia with astigmatism) in aphakic and non-aphakic persons with non-diseased eyes in powers from -20.00 to +20.00 diopters and astigmatic correction from -0.25 to -10.00 dioptersSame
    Single UseSingle-use, disposableSame
    ReplacementDaily Wear, disinfect using chemical or hydrogen peroxide disinfectant when prescribed for planned replacementSame
    Material USAN Nameenfilcon ASame
    Principle of OperationDesigned to fit over corneal surface of eye to provide corrective refraction for functional conditions of the eyeSame
    Refractive Index1.40Same
    Oxygen Permeability x 10 -11100 (cm²/sec)(ml O₂)/ml*mmHg)Same
    Base Curve8.2 to 9.2 mmSame
    Diameter13.5 to 15.0 mmSame
    Power Range-20.00 to +20.00 DSame
    Cylinder Power-0.25 to -10.00 DSame
    Water Content (avg, %wt)46%46%
    Monomer sonication stepNoYes

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • Test Set Sample Size: The document does not specify a distinct "test set" sample size for clinical studies because it explicitly states that "In-vivo clinical studies were not required for this change." The evaluation was based on physiochemical studies.
    • Data Provenance: The physiochemical studies were "conducted by CooperVision following scientific protocols." No specific country of origin or whether it was retrospective or prospective is mentioned, but it implies internal, prospective laboratory testing.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • Not applicable. Since in-vivo clinical studies were not required and the assessment was based on physiochemical properties, there was no "ground truth" established by experts in a clinical context for a test set. The ground truth was based on physical and chemical measurements against established specifications for contact lenses and comparison to predicate devices.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set:

    • Not applicable. No clinical test set involving human judgment was used. The physiochemical studies would involve laboratory measurements conforming to predefined technical specifications.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • Not applicable. This submission is for contact lenses, not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    • Not applicable. This submission is for contact lenses, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used:

    • The "ground truth" for the physiochemical studies was based on physical and chemical measurements of the lens properties (e.g., refractive index, oxygen permeability, water content, modulus, etc.) against established scientific standards and comparison to the characteristics of the predicate device (AVAIRA Sphere and Toric Soft Contact Lenses, K071736/K113759).

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not applicable. This submission is for a physical medical device (contact lenses), not a machine learning or AI device that requires a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not applicable. As above, no training set was used.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1