Search Results

Dental casting alloy for making dental restorations and appliances. is not indicated for use with don't a posislaw, (this ally

Silver-palladium based casting alloy

This document is a 510(k) summary for AURECAST 2 Dental casting alloy. It describes a comparison between the new device and a legally marketed predicate device (Jelenko Maestro) to demonstrate substantial equivalence, rather than providing a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of AI/software performance. Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted directly from this document.

However, I can extract the information related to the comparison of properties that serves as the basis for demonstrating substantial equivalence.

Here's an analysis based on the document:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document doesn't define explicit "acceptance criteria" in the typical sense of a software or medical device performance study (e.g., minimum sensitivity/specificity). Instead, it uses a comparison to a predicate device to establish substantial equivalence. The "acceptance criteria" can be inferred as the properties of the legally marketed predicate device, and the "reported device performance" are the properties of the AURECAST 2.

Ask a specific question about this device