Search Results

The Atrium ClearWay™ PTFE Balloon Catheter is intended for the removal of fresh, soft emboli and thrombi and for intraluminal irrigation of fluids.

Not Found

The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a medical device called the "Atrium Clearway™ PTFE Balloon Catheter." It is NOT a study report or clinical trial documentation, but rather a regulatory approval document.

Therefore, the input does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria. The FDA letter only states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to legally marketed predicate devices.

Here's why the requested information cannot be extracted from the provided text:

1. Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Table: The document does not mention any specific acceptance criteria (e.g., minimum performance thresholds) or report any device performance metrics (e.g., efficacy rates, safety outcomes) from a study.
2. Sample Size and Data Provenance: No study is described, so there is no information about sample sizes or the origin of any data.
3. Number and Qualifications of Experts for Ground Truth: Since no study is described, there's no mention of ground truth establishment or experts involved.
4. Adjudication Method: No study, no adjudication method.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study: This is only relevant for AI/imaging-based devices, and this letter is for a physical catheter. No such study is mentioned or implied.
6. Standalone Performance Study: No performance study is described. The clearance is based on substantial equivalence, not a standalone performance trial.
7. Type of Ground Truth: No ground truth is mentioned.
8. Training Set Sample Size: This is relevant for machine learning/AI models. This device is a catheter, not an AI model, and no training set is mentioned.
9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established: Not applicable.

Conclusion:

The provided document is a regulatory approval letter and does not contain the details of a study or acceptance criteria as requested. To answer these questions, one would need access to the 510(k) summary or the full 510(k) submission, which might describe the testing performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device