Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K190641
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2020-02-21

    (345 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3640
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    AR_N SLA Type Implant System

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    AR N SLA Type Implant System is indicated for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae, in support of single or multiple-unit restorations including; cemented retained, or overdenture restorations, and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed bridgework. AR_N SLA Type Implant System is for two stage surgical procedures. It is intended for delayed load.

    Device Description

    The AR_N SLA Type Implant System is a dental implant system made of CP Ti Gr 4 per ASTM F67, intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw arches for loading affer a conventional healing period. The implants may be used to replace one or more missing teeth. The surface of the implants has been treated with SLA(Sandblasted with Large-grit and Acid-etching). The AR N SLA Type Implant System is offered in the following sizes. Subject implant bodies are to be used only with all abutments cleared in the primary predicate submission, and the cover screw and abutment screw to be used are the same as cleared in the primary predicate.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the information required to answer your request. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter and summary for a dental implant system (AR_N SLA Type Implant System). It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on non-clinical testing (sterilization validation, surface characteristics, fatigue, biocompatibility, pyrogenicity, LAL bacterial endotoxin, and shelf life).

    The text does not describe any study involving AI, human readers, or the establishment of ground truth by expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data. Therefore, I cannot extract details regarding:

    1. Acceptance criteria for AI performance or reported device performance related to AI.
    2. Sample sizes for test sets in an AI context or data provenance.
    3. Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth establishment.
    4. Adjudication methods for test sets.
    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study results or effect sizes.
    6. Standalone (algorithm only) performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used in an AI study.
    8. Sample size for training sets.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.

    The document is purely about the physical and material characteristics, manufacturing processes, and safety testing of a dental implant for FDA clearance, not about any AI-powered device or diagnostic tool.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1