Search Results

The HydroCision ArthroJet System with Cautery, TurboBurr, and Curette is indicated for orthopedic surgical procedures where the cutting and removal of soft tissue and the ablation and removal of hard tissue or bone is required, with control of bleeding during those procedures as needed. Specific functions include cutting, ablation and shaping of soft tissue, and drilling, reaming, decorticating and smoothing of bone, cartilage and other bone related tissue in a variety of surgical procedures including open and minimally invasive spinal surgeries and small and large joint arthroscopic procedures.

The HydroCision ArthroJet System with Cautery, TurboBurr and Curette employs two basic system components to achieve its mechanism of action:

• the reusable power console unit
• the sterile, disposable pump cartridge, handpiece and tubing assembly.

The handpiece component of the sterile, disposable assembly is comprised of two principal components:

• a high pressure fluid conduit with integral fluidjet nozzle.
• a low pressure collection tube.

The high pressure conduit consists of a hollow stainless steel tube with a nozzle at the distal end. The collection tube incorporates an opening at its distal end such that the fluidjet is directed into the opening when in use. Because of the hydrodynamic design of the fluidjet/collection tube combination, the orifice serves to pull excised tissue fragments and other debris into the collection tube. Controls on the front panel allows the user to adjust the pressure, from zero to a factory pre-set limit of 15,000 psi.

The provided 510(k) summary for the HydroCision ArthroJet System with Cautery, TurboBurr, and Curette (K041233) describes an electrosurgical cutting and coagulation device. However, it does not contain the specific information requested about acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance against those criteria in the context of AI/ML or diagnostic accuracy studies.

The document discusses substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on:

1. Design similarities: between the proposed system and the currently marketed HydroCision ArthroJet with Cautery, TurboBurr and Curette.
2. Performance testing: Stated as "Bench testing was conducted to determine device functionality and conformance to design input requirements."

This summary is typical for a traditional medical device (like a surgical tool) 510(k) submission, where the focus is on physical characteristics, mechanical function, and comparison to a predicate device, rather than the kind of diagnostic accuracy or AI/ML performance study metrics outlined in your request.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information for the acceptance criteria and study details as they pertain to AI/ML or diagnostic performance based on the input document.

The document does not mention:

• Specific acceptance criteria with numerical targets.
• Reported device performance against such criteria.
• Sample sizes for test sets or training sets.
• Data provenance.
• Number or qualifications of experts.
• Adjudication methods.
• MRMC comparative effectiveness study or human reader improvement with AI.
• Standalone algorithm performance.
• Types or establishment of ground truth in the context of diagnostic accuracy.

Ask a specific question about this device