Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K111184
    Date Cleared
    2011-06-22

    (56 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3560
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    APEX PS KNEE SYSTEM - PS-C INSERT

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Apex Knee™ System is intended for use as a primary or revision total knee replacement. This prosthesis may be used for the following conditions, as appropriate:

    • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis;
    • Rheumatoid arthritis;
    • Correction of functional deformity;
    • Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed;
      The porous coated femoral component may be used cemented (biological fixation). All other femoral, tibial baseplate, and patellar components are indicated for cemented use only.
      The Apex Knee™ Modular Tibial Augments are intended to be bolted to the Tibia baseplate and cemented to the prepared tibia.
    Device Description

    The posterior stabilized system offers a femoral component and two tibial inserts (PS (K102578) and PS-C (subject device)) offering different levels of constraint. The PS-C Insert post is approximately 1 mm larger than the PS Insert (K102578). The slightly larger post is designed to produce more varus/valgus and internal/external rotational constraint.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the Apex PS Knee System PS-C Insert and its comparison to a predicate device, the Apex PS Knee System, PS Insert (K102578). The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence through non-clinical testing rather than clinical studies using patient data. Therefore, many of the requested categories related to clinical study design, such as sample size, expert ground truth, and reader studies, are not applicable in this context.

    Here's a breakdown of the available information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are implicitly met by demonstrating that the subject device's performance characteristics are either identical to or within acceptable variations of the predicate device, as determined by specific ASTM standards. No explicit numerical "acceptance criteria" are stated for performance metrics in the table; rather, the subject device's design and mechanical properties are compared to the predicate.

    CharacteristicPredicate Device (Apex PS Knee System, PS Insert - K102578)Subject Device (Apex PS Knee System PS-C Insert)Comparison / Performance
    Intended UsePrimary and revision total knee replacementYesIdentical intended use.
    Design: Post Width15 - 20 mm depending on size16 - 21 mm depending on sizeSlightly larger post (approx. 1mm larger) in the subject device, designed to produce more varus/valgus and internal/external rotational constraint.
    Design: Varus/Valgus ConstraintNo Varus/Valgus Constraint3 - 4°Subject device shows added varus/valgus constraint compared to the predicate, as designed.
    Design: Internal/External Rotation14 - 20°11 - 17°Subject device shows a narrower range of internal/external rotation compared to the predicate, indicating increased rotational constraint, as designed.
    Design: Range of Motion6° hyperextension and 132° flexionIdentical to K102578Identical.
    Design: Condyle Geometry and Contact AreaToroidal convex femoral surface and a toroidal concave insert surface with medial-lateral and anterior-posterior radii that increase with component sizeIdentical geometry to K102578Identical.
    Design: Tibia Baseplate Mating FeatureMates with two parallel dovetail rails on Tibia Baseplate.Identical to K102578Identical.
    MaterialsUHMWPE ASTM F648Identical to K102578Identical Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE ASTM F648).
    Packaging & SterilizationEthylene oxide, SAL 10^-6^, Paper Board Box, Double Tyvek inner pouchIdentical to K102578Identical.
    Non-Clinical Test SummaryROM evaluation per ASTM F2083-08, FDA "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Knee Joint Patellofemorotibial and Femorotibial Metal/Polymer Porous-Coated Uncemented Prostheses; Guidance for Industry and FDA" Tibio-Femoral Constraint per ASTM F2083-08, ASTM F1223-03N/A (Tests conducted on subject device)The tests were conducted to demonstrate the subject device's performance against the established standards (ASTM F2083-08, ASTM F1223-03) and FDA guidance, allowing for comparison of its characteristics (like varus/valgus and rotational constraint) against the predicate.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size: Not specified in terms of number of devices or units tested. The document refers to "the following tests were conducted," implying a sufficient number of samples were used for the mechanical tests to be representative and meet the requirements of the ASTM standards.
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable as no clinical data (patient data) was used. The tests were non-clinical, likely bench testing performed by the manufacturer or a contract lab.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    • Not Applicable: No clinical studies were performed, and thus no "ground truth" based on expert medical evaluation of patient data was established for a test set. The "ground truth" for non-clinical testing refers to the accepted standards (ASTM F2083-08, ASTM F1223-03) and FDA guidance.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • Not Applicable: No human review or adjudication of clinical outcomes was involved.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    • No: No MRMC study was performed. The evaluation was based on non-clinical, mechanical testing.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    • Not Applicable: This device is a mechanical implant, not an algorithm or AI system.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    • Standards and Guidance: The "ground truth" or reference for performance was established by recognized industry standards (ASTM F2083-08, ASTM F1223-03) and FDA guidance documents specific to knee joint prostheses. These standards define the methods and expected performance characteristics for evaluating such devices.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Not Applicable: No training set was used as this involved mechanical testing of a physical device, not an AI or algorithm.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • Not Applicable: No training set was used.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1