Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K013110
    Date Cleared
    2001-12-19

    (161 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    886.1340
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ANISEIKONIA INSPECTOR

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The device is designed to detect and quantify the amount of aniseikonia of a patient. Aniseikonia is defined as a condition of binocular vision where there is a relative difference in the size and/or shape of the ocular image of the two eyes. If a significant amount of aniseikonia is detected in a patient, a new prescription (contact lenses and/or glasses) can be calculated to reduce the amount of aniseikonia.

    This device is intended to assist in the detection and management of aniseikonia.

    Device Description

    The device is based on an old technique called 'direct comparison eikonometry'. I.e. the two eyes are offered a different image and the subject needs to determine if there is a size imbalance between the two images. If there is an imbalance in size, the size 16 a one of the images is changed until the subject perceives the two images as equal in size. The extent in which one of the images needed to be changed in size is a measure for the amount of aniseikonia of the subject. In The Aniseikonia Inspector the separation between the two eyes is accomplished by holding a red and a green filter in front of the eyes. The images are created on a computer screen and they can be altered by using a computer periheral such as the keyboard.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided 510(k) summary does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance, study details, and related elements typically found in a clinical study report. The document describes the device, its intended use, and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device, but it lacks the specific data requested in the prompt.

    Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions about acceptance criteria, study design, and performance metrics based solely on the provided text. The document is primarily a notification of intent to market and a confirmation of FDA's substantial equivalence determination, rather than a detailed report of a performance study.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1