Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K082300
    Date Cleared
    2009-02-18

    (190 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ANATOMIC LOCKING PLATING SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DePuy Anatomic Locking Plating System is intended for fixation of fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions of the clavicle, humerus, radius, ulna, olecranon, metacarpal, metatarsal, malleolus, tibia and fibula, particularly in osteopenic bone.

    Device Description

    The DePuy Anatomic Locking Plating System is substantially equivalent to currently marketed devices.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the DePuy Anatomic Locking Plating System. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device rather than proving performance against specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study or a standalone algorithm performance study.

    Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and ground truth establishment for a device performance study is not applicable to this 510(k) summary.

    The 510(k) summary states:

    • "The DePuy Anatomic Locking Plating System is substantially equivalent to currently marketed devices as demonstrated with pre-clinical data." This indicates that equivalence was shown through non-clinical testing (e.g., mechanical tests, materials characterization), not a clinical study with performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy.
    • "No new issues of safety or efficacy have been raised." This reinforces that the submission aims to show the device is as safe and effective as existing, legally marketed devices, not to establish new safety or efficacy profiles to meet specific performance criteria.

    In summary, the provided document does not contain the information requested because it is a 510(k) premarket notification, which relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than meeting specific pre-defined acceptance criteria through a new performance study.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1