Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K220267
    Date Cleared
    2022-10-07

    (249 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5440
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    AMSafe NeuFlo Needleless Connector

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The AMSafe® NeuFloTM Needleless Connector are intended to use as an accessory to intravascular administration set for the administration of fluids to a patient through a cannula placed in the vein or artery.

    Device Description

    AMSafe® NeuFlo™ Needleless Connector is a single use, sterile, non-pyrogenic device intended for use as an accessory to intravascular administration set.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the AMSafe® NeuFlo™ Needleless Connector. This document outlines the device's characteristics, its comparison to a predicate device, and the non-clinical testing performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

    However, the provided text does not describe a study involving an AI/Machine Learning device, nor does it detail a study that proves a device meets acceptance criteria in the context of AI/ML performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or reader studies.

    Instead, it details the acceptance criteria and results for a physical medical device. The criteria are based on compliance with established ISO standards and other tests to confirm physical, chemical, and biological performance. The "performance" described refers to the functionality and safety of the needleless connector itself, not AI model performance.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request as it pertains to AI/Machine Learning evaluation criteria, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, type of ground truth, training set sample size, or training set ground truth establishment in the context of an AI/ML device.

    The document speaks to the following for the physical medical device:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    The document provides a table under "g) Summary of Non-clinical testing (Bench)" listing tests, methods, acceptance criteria, and conclusions (Pass/Fail).

    TestMethodAcceptance CriteriaConclusion
    Physical Performance test
    Leakage TestISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Luer adapter connectionISO80369-7ISO80369-7Pass
    Free Flow rateISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Particulate contaminationISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Chemical performance test
    Reducing matterISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Metal ionsISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Titration acidity or alkalinityISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Residue on evaporationISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    UV absorption of extract solutionISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    EO residual testISO10993-7≤10µg/gPass
    Biological performance test
    Sterility testISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    PyrogenicityISO8536-4ISO8536-4Pass
    Biocompatibility test
    In vitro cytotoxicity testISO10993-5ISO10993-5Pass
    Skin sensitization test 0.9% sodium chloride injection extractISO10993-10ISO10993-10Pass
    Skin sensitization test sesame oil extractISO10993-10ISO10993-10Pass
    Intracutaneous reactivity test 0.9% sodium chloride injection extractISO10993-10ISO10993-10Pass
    Acute systemic toxicity test sesame oil extractISO10993-11ISO10993-11Pass
    Pyrogen test 0.9% sodium chloride injection extract rabbitISO10993-11ISO10993-11Pass
    Bacteria endotoxins test Gel-Clot techniqueUSP 43-NFUSP 43-NFPass
    Subchronic systemic toxicity testISO10993-11ISO10993-11Pass
    In Vitro hemolytic properties testISO10993-4ISO10993-4Pass

    For the other points (2-9), as explained, the document pertains to a physical medical device and its compliance with standards, not an AI/ML device performance study. Thus, no information is available regarding:

    • Sample size used for the test set and data provenance (in an AI/ML context).
    • Number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications.
    • Adjudication method for the test set.
    • Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study.
    • Standalone (algorithm only) performance.
    • Type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc. for an AI/ML model).
    • Sample size for the training set.
    • How the ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1