Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K061389
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-07-19

    (62 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ALLTHREAD LACTOSORB SUTURE ANCHOR

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Indications for the ALLthread™ LactoSorb® Suture Anchor include use in soft tissue reattachment procedures in the shoulder, wrist/hand, ankle/foot, elbow, and knee. Specific indications are as follows:

    Shoulder: Bankart repair, SLAP lesion repair, acromioclavicular separation repair, rotator cuff repair, capsule repair or capsulolabral reconstruction, biceps tenodesis, deltoid repair.

    Wrist/Hand: Scapholunate ligament reconstruction, ulnar/radial collateral ligament reconstruction.

    Ankle/Foot: Lateral Stabilization, medial stabilization, Achilles tendon repair/reconstruction, Halluxvalgus reconstruction, mid- and forefoot reconstruction.

    Elbow: Tennis elbow repair, Biceps tendon reconstruction, ulnar or radial collateral ligament reconstruction.

    Knee: Medial collateral ligament repair, lateral collateral ligament repair, posterior oblique ligament repair, joint capsule closure, iliotibial band tenodesis, patellar ligament/tendon repair.

    Device Description

    The ALLthread™ LactoSorb® Suture Anchor is made with an L-Lactide / Glycolice resorbable material, preloaded with #2 polyethylene surgical sutures. The design will enable the anchor to be inserted either without pre-drilling or through a pre-drilled hole.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the ALLthread™ LactoSorb® Suture Anchor. It details the device's characteristics and its substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. However, it explicitly states:

    "Clinical Testing: None provided as a basis for substantial equivalence."

    This means that a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria based on clinical performance was not performed for this submission. The substantial equivalence was determined through non-clinical laboratory testing.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them from this document.

    If this were a document that included such a study, the information would typically be presented as follows:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    Performance MetricAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    [Metric 1, e.g., Tensile Strength][e.g., > 100 N][e.g., 125 N]
    [Metric 2, e.g., Fixation Strength][e.g., No pull-out after X cycles][e.g., Maintained fixation after Y cycles]
    [Metric 3, e.g., Biocompatibility][e.g., Passes ISO 10993 cytotoxicity test][e.g., Passed ISO 10993-5]
    .........

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

    • Sample Size: [Number of devices/tests]
    • Data Provenance: [e.g., In vitro laboratory testing, Animal study in X species, etc. (Since clinical testing was not done, this would describe the non-clinical test set)].

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications:

    • Not applicable for this type of submission. For clinical studies involving human interpretation or diagnosis, this would usually involve physicians, radiologists, or other specialists.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

    • Not applicable for this type of submission. Adjudication is typically used in clinical trials involving human assessment to resolve discrepancies.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

    • No, an MRMC study was not done. These are highly specific to AI/software performance studies involving human readers.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance:

    • No, standalone performance was not assessed. This is also specific to AI/software.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

    • For this submission, the "ground truth" for non-clinical testing would be the established scientific and engineering principles and standards used to evaluate the device's physical and mechanical properties, as well as its biocompatibility. For instance, tensile strength measurements have an objective "ground truth" based on physics.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

    • Not applicable. This relates to machine learning models, which are not described in this submission.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

    • Not applicable. This also relates to machine learning models.

    In summary, based on the provided text, the ALLthread™ LactoSorb® Suture Anchor received its 510(k) clearance based on non-clinical laboratory testing demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, without the need for clinical testing or establishing specific clinical acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1