Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K060215
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-03-24

    (56 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.1660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ALBU TROL, LOW, MODEL 108.001.002; ALBU TROL, HIGH 108.002.002

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    AlbuTrol is an assayed albumin control intended for professional use in the verification of the precision and accuracy of the HemoCue® Urine Albumin and HemoCue® Albumin 201 systems.

    Device Description

    AlbuTrol is an assayed urine albumin control material. AlbuTrol control material is filled of in dropper bottles. Each dropper bottle contains 1.0 mL human urine with a specific amount of human albumin. AlbuTrol provides two physiologically relevant levels covering the clincally interesting ranges of urine albumin: ~25 mg/L albumin and ~75 mg/L aboumin. The assigned values of each batch are printed on both the carton box and the dropper bottles.

    AlbuTrol is packed in carton boxes. Each carton box contains 2 dropper bottles of the same level on a carton tray. An insert with Intended Use is packed in each box of album of the

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the 510(k) summary for AlbuTrol, a quality control material. It focuses on the product's description, intended use, technological characteristics, and a brief statement about performance assessment.

    However, the document does not contain the detailed study information required to fully answer your request regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria. Specifically, it lacks:

    • Explicit acceptance criteria: The document states that AlbuTrol is for "verification of the precision and accuracy" of HemoCue systems, but it does not specify quantitative targets or thresholds for this precision and accuracy (e.g., a specific coefficient of variation, bias limits, etc.).
    • Detailed study methodology: It mentions "Studies were conducted in-house to demonstrate the performance," but provides no details about these studies, such as sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, or adjudication methods.
    • Reported device performance: While it assures performance, it doesn't present actual results against any criteria.
    • Information on training sets, MRMC studies, or standalone performance.

    Therefore, I cannot populate most of your requested tables and sections based solely on the provided text.

    Here's an attempt to answer based on the limited information available, with significant gaps noted:

    Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Note: The provided document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria or detailed reported performance values. It only generically states the material's purpose is for "verification of the precision and accuracy."

    Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific Acceptance Criteria (Not explicitly stated in document)Reported Device Performance (Not explicitly stated in document)
    Precision(e.g., %CV
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1