Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K123314
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2013-01-22

    (89 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.4350
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Affinity Fusion Oxygenator with Integrated Arterial Filter and Carmeda BioActive Surface is intended to be used in an extracorporeal perfusion circuit to oxygenate and remove carbon dioxide from the blood and to cool or warm the blood during routine cardiopulmonary bypass procedures up to 6 hours in duration.

    The Affinity Fusion Oxygenator with Integrated Arterial Filter and Carmeda BioActive Surface is designed to filter from the circuit microemboli larger than the specified micron size for periods up to six hours during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

    Device Description

    The Affinity Fusion Oxygenator with Integrated Arterial Filter and Carmeda BioActive Surface is a single-use, microporous, hollow-fiber, gas-exchange device with plasma-resistant fiber and integrated heat exchanger and arterial filter. The oxygenator is bonded on its primary blood contacting surfaces with a non-leaching biocompatible surface to reduce platelet activation and adhesion and preserve platelet function. The device is single-use, nontoxic, nonpyrogenic, supplied STERILE in individual packaging. The device is sterilized by ethylene oxide.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided information regarding the acceptance criteria and supporting studies for the Affinity Fusion Oxygenator.

    The document indicates that the device is a Class II medical device, and its approval is based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Affinity NT Hollow Fiber Oxygenator with Plasma Resistant Fiber with Carmeda BioActive Surface Model CB511, K000430). The assessment does not involve AI or algorithms, as it is a physical medical device. Therefore, many of the typical questions for AI/ML device descriptions regarding training sets, validation sets, expert adjudication, and MRMC studies are not applicable.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are generally established by the referenced standards and guidance documents. The document states that the device "passed each test mentioned in the table below." Specific numerical acceptance values are not provided within this summary, but the tests themselves represent the criteria.

    Test TitleTest ClassificationReported Device Performance
    Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide TransferFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Time Dependent Performance ChangesFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Heat Exchanger PerformanceFunctional/PerformancePassed
    High Flow Blood TraumaFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Min Flow Blood TraumaFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Plasma BreakthroughFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Time to PrimeFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Gross Air HandlingFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Filtration EfficiencyFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Cap PullsPhysical/MechanicalPassed
    IntegrityPhysical/MechanicalPassed
    Blood VolumesPhysical/MechanicalPassed
    Port Break and Tube PullPhysical/MechanicalPassed
    Luer port design - sampling portPhysical/MechanicalPassed
    Luer port design - air purge linePhysical/MechanicalPassed
    Carmeda Coverage/LeachingFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Carmeda BioactivityFunctional/PerformancePassed
    Particulate SheddingFunctional/PerformancePassed

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    This is not applicable as the device is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML-based diagnostic or prognostic tool. The "test set" would refer to the physical units of the oxygenator that underwent in vitro testing. The document does not specify the number of units tested.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    This is not applicable for a physical medical device. "Ground truth" in this context refers to established performance benchmarks for oxygenators, as outlined in the cited guidance documents and ISO standards. These standards are developed by consensus among experts in the field, but individual experts are not "establishing ground truth" for each test.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This is not applicable for a physical medical device. The evaluation is based on objective measurements against pre-defined performance specifications derived from standards and guidance documents.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done

    No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for evaluating the impact of AI on human reader performance, which is not applicable to a physical medical device like an oxygenator.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This is not applicable. The device is a physical medical device and does not involve an algorithm. The performance evaluation is inherently "standalone" in the sense that the device's functional integrity and performance are tested in vitro.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    For this physical medical device, the "ground truth" for performance is established by:

    • Standards: ISO 7199 "Cardiovascular implants and artificial organs - Blood-gas exchangers (oxygenators)" and ISO 15675 "Cardiovascular implants and artificial organs - Cardiopulmonary bypass systems - Arterial blood line filters."
    • FDA Guidance Documents: "Guidance for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Oxygenators 510(k) Submissions" and "Guidance for Cardiopulmonary Bypass Arterial Line Blood Filter 510(k) Submissions."

    These documents define the performance parameters and acceptable ranges for such devices.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This is not applicable as the device is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML system requiring a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

    This is not applicable as the device is a physical medical device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1