Search Results

The Aesculap Sterilcontainer System is a reusable sterilization container system (consisting of solid and perforated bottoms, a perforated lid w/ filter retention plates, and reusable polytetrafluoroethylene filters) intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider. It is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed device and also maintain sterility of the enclosed device until used. This container system is compatible for use in pre-vacuum steam and flash sterilization. The SterilContainer System includes accessories such as silicon mats, baskets, trays, and racks.

The Aesculap SterilContainer with PrimeLine Lid is used in conjunction with Aesculap's Sterilcontainer System (K792558 & K944864). The PrimeLine Container Lid is designed to be compatible for use with pre-vacuum steam and pre-vacuum flash sterilization. The lid is manufactured from Radel R 5000/5008 and utilizes a reusable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filter.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Aesculap SterilContainer with PrimeLine Lids. It's a premarket notification for a medical device and describes its substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices. The document highlights the device's technological characteristics and performance data related to sterilization, but it does not contain the specific information required to answer all sections of your prompt.

Here's an analysis based on the information available:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document describes performance data in terms of sterilization validation. However, it does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" with numerical targets and then report performance against those targets in a formal table. Instead, it states that the device was "fully validated" against FDA guidance and AAMI standards for steam and flash sterilization.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

The document states, "The Aesculap Sterilcontainer system was fully validated for the steam and flash sterilization in a prevacuum steam and flash cycle." It also indicates that this validation was conducted "by a qualified testing laboratory." However, specific sample sizes (e.g., number of cycles, number of containers tested) for the validation study are not provided. The provenance of the data is that it was generated during product validation (likely in the US based on the FDA submission) by a qualified testing laboratory, and it would be prospective data collected specifically for the purpose of demonstrating device performance.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

This information is not available in the provided document. Sterilization validation typically involves scientific and engineering principles, often with industry standards (like AAMI) serving as the "ground truth" for successful sterilization. There is no mention of human experts establishing ground truth in the context of this device's performance data.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

This information is not available in the provided document. Adjudication methods are typically relevant for studies involving human assessment or interpretation (e.g., medical imaging classification). For device performance validation related to sterilization, "adjudication" in the sense of expert consensus on an output is not typically a component. The success/failure of sterilization (e.g., through biological indicator testing) is typically objective.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

This is not applicable to this device. The Aesculap SterilContainer with PrimeLine Lids is a medical device for sterilization, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers. Therefore, an MRMC study related to AI assistance would not have been performed.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

This is not applicable to this device. This is a physical medical device. It does not involve an algorithm or AI that would have standalone performance.

7. The type of ground truth used:

The ground truth used for this type of device validation would be based on established scientific principles of sterilization effectiveness and compliance with recognized standards (e.g., FDA guidance, AAMI standards for sterilization). This would involve demonstrating the killing of microbial spores (e.g., using biological indicators) and maintaining sterility over time. It's not "expert consensus" in the sense of diagnostic interpretation, nor is it pathology or outcomes data in the clinical sense.

8. The sample size for the training set:

This is not applicable. This is a physical device, not an AI model requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

This is not applicable. As it's not an AI model, there is no training set or associated ground truth establishment process.

Ask a specific question about this device