Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K053033
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-06-06

    (222 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.3610
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ACRO BIOTECH LLC RAPID METHAMPHETAMINE URINE TEST; CATALOG# MET001000

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Acro Rapid Methamphetamine Urine Test is a lateral flow, rapid immunoassay for the qualitative detection of Methamphetamine in human urine at a cutoff of 500 ng/mL. The test is used to obtain a visual qualitative result and is intended for laboratory use only.

    This assay provides only preliminary results. Clinical consideration and professional judgment must be applied to a drug test result, particularly in evaluating a preliminary positive result. In order to obtain a confirmed analytical result, a more specific alternate chemical method is needed. Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectroscopy (GC/MS) analysis is preferred.

    Device Description

    Acro Rapid Methamphetamine Urine Test is a lateral flow, rapid immunoassay for the qualitative detection of Methamphetamine in human urine at a cutoff of 500 ng/mL.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Acro Rapid Methamphetamine Urine Test. It includes the device name, regulation information, significant equivalence determination, and indications for use. However, it does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, or other specifics of performance testing.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
    2. Sample sizes used for the test set and data provenance
    3. Number of experts used to establish ground truth and their qualifications
    4. Adjudication method
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study details
    6. Standalone performance details
    7. Type of ground truth used
    8. Sample size for the training set
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established

    The document is a clearance letter, not a performance study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1