Search Results

The Gyrus ACMI® Invisio® ICN (CystoNephroscope) System (which includes the ICN Endoscope and Controller) is intended for use to examine body cavities, hollow organs and canals in the body, in the urinary tract, and can be used percutaneously to examine the interior of the kidney; and, using additional accessories, can be used to perform various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Like the predicate ACMI® Invisio® ICN CystoNephroscope System, the Gyrus ACMI® Invisio® ICN is a flexible endoscope that incorporates CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) sensor technology to generate an image of the interior of the bladder or kidney when inserted either through the urethra into the bladder or through a percutaneous tract into the abdominal cavity or kidney.

The ICN incorporates the same basic video imaging technology located in the endoscope as the predicate device. There is a miniature CMOS sensor located in the endoscope tip, wiring running through the endoscope shaft, a printed circuit board (PCB), a light-emitting diode (LED) light source located in the handle, and an electrical cord that connects the endoscope to the Camera Control Unit.

Like the predicate device, the ICN uses the same Camera Control Unit (CCU) that contains printed circuits boards (PCBs), software, power supply and power cables to process and display the images transmitted by the camera.

This Special 510(k) proposes video sensor performance modifications to the ACMI® Invisio® ICN. The indications for use, labeling, principles of operation, materials and overall dimensions of the proposed Gyrus ACMI® Invisio® ICN remain the same as in the predicate device.

The provided text describes a Special 510(k) Notification for the Gyrus ACMI® Invisio® ICN, which is a flexible endoscope. This notification specifically concerns "video sensor performance modifications" to the device.

However, the provided document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria, as typically found in comprehensive device validation reports.

Instead, this document is a summary of safety and effectiveness for a 510(k) submission, confirming that the modified device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device. It explicitly states: "The proposed modification in design specifications, performance specifications, and software specifications are not substantial changes or modifications, and do not significantly affect the safety or efficacy of the devices."

Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or answer the other questions as the information is not present in the provided text. The document focuses on regulatory equivalence rather than a detailed performance study with acceptance criteria.

Ask a specific question about this device

The ACMI® INVISIO ICN (ICN) Digital Flexible CystoNephroscope System (which includes the ICN scope and Controller) is intended for use to examine body cavities, hollow organs and canals in the body, in the urinary tract, and can be used percutaneously to examine the interior of the kidney; and, using additional accessories, can be used to perform various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Like the predicate ACMI® Electronic Video CystoNephroscope (ECN) System, the ACMI® INVISIO ICN (ICN) is a flexible endoscope that incorporates CMOS (complimentary medical oxide semi-conductor) sensor technology to generate an image. The ICN can be introduced either through the urethra into the bladder or through a percutaneous tract into the abdominal cavity or kidney.

The ICN incorporates the same basic video imaging technology located in the endoscope as the predicate device. There is a miniature CMOS sensor located in the distal tip, wiring running through the endoscope shaft, a printed circuit board (PCB), a light-emitting diode (LED) light source located in the handle, and an electrical cord that connects the endoscope to the Camera Control Unit.

Like the predicate device, the ICN uses the same Camera Control Unit (CCU) that contains printed circuits boards (PCBs), software, power supply and power cables to process and display the images transmitted by the camera.

This Special 510(k) proposes modifications in the proximal handle design, a reduction in flexible shaft outer diameter, elimination of the secondary active deflection mechanism, and a minor software algorithm modification for the ACMI® INVISIO ICN. The indications for use, principles of operation, working channel length and diameter of the ACMI® INVISIO ICN remain the same as in the predicate device.

The provided document is a 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness for a medical device (ACMI® INVISIO ICN). It states that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device and outlines its intended use and modifications. However, the document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific performance criteria.

This type of submission (Special 510(k)) primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device rather than presenting detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria in the same way a de novo or PMA submission might. The "summary of safety and effectiveness" here is an assertion that the modifications do not significantly affect safety or efficacy, based on the principle of substantial equivalence to the predicate.

Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria, reported device performance, sample sizes used, ground truth establishment, or details about MRMC or standalone studies because this information is not present in the provided text.

The document states: "The proposed modifications for the ACMI® INVISIO ICN, as described in this submission, are substantially equivalent to the predicate device. The proposed modification in design specifications, performance specifications, dimensional specifications, and software specifications are not substantial changes or modifications, and do not significantly affect the safety or efficacy of the devices." This suggests that the primary "proof" relies on the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate device and the minor nature of the changes to the new device.

Ask a specific question about this device