Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K961860
    Date Cleared
    1996-08-29

    (107 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.1720
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The A4907 Lens Cleaning Sheath has been specifically designed to be used with the Olympus A4908 Valve and LTF-V OES V Laparo-Thoraco Videoscope to clean of the objective lens surface.

    Device Description

    The A4907 Lens Cleaning Sheath has been specifically designed for use with the Olympus A4908 Valve and LTF-V OES Laparo-Thoraco Videoscope. It will be included in the standard set of LTF-V Laparo-Thoraco Videoscope and will also be marketed separately.

    When connected to the main body of LTF-V videoscope, it offers lens cleaning, irrigation, and suction capabilities to the user during endoscopic procedures. It is substantially equivalent in design, intended use, and method of operation to the "Lens Cleaner" manufactured by Cook, "Optic Shaft" manufactured by Wiest, and "Lap Wash System" manufactured by DevMed Group Inc.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the Olympus A4907 Lens Cleaning Sheath. It describes the device's intended use and design, comparing it to predicate devices. However, this document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance results from a study, sample sizes, expert ground truth establishment, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or training set details.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and information as these details are not present in the provided text. The summary explicitly states: "When compared with the predicate devices, Olympus A4907 Lens Cleaning Sheath does not incorporate any significant change in intended use, method of operation, material, or design that could affect the safety or effectiveness of the subject device." This suggests the approval relied on substantial equivalence rather than a new performance study demonstrating specific acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1