Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K032756
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2003-12-04

    (90 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    A-DEC 532/533 DELIVERY SYSTEM MODEL, 532/533

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The A-dec 532/533 Delivery System Dental Unit and accessories are intended for use in general dental applications by providing the dental practitioner a user interface to control operation of the dental chair and attached dental devices. The system delivers air, water, vacuum and electricity to allow the dental practitioner an intuitive control center for all common and normal patient treatment procedures performed in the dental operatory.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA regarding the A-DEC 532/533 Delivery System Model. This document confirms the substantial equivalence of the device to a legally marketed predicate device and grants market approval. However, it does not contain the detailed information about acceptance criteria, study design, or performance metrics that you requested.

    The letter is focused on regulatory approval based on substantial equivalence, which primarily involves comparing the new device to existing ones rather than presenting a standalone study with specific performance criteria and results.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information, including:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This document does not specify quantitative acceptance criteria or performance data.
    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not mentioned.
    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not mentioned.
    4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not mentioned.
    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and its effect size: Not mentioned.
    6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable as this is a physical dental delivery system, not an algorithm.
    7. The type of ground truth used: Not mentioned.
    8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable as this is a physical device, not an AI/algorithm-based system requiring a training set in the typical sense.
    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

    The document indicates that the device is a "Dental Operative Unit and Accessories" intended for "general dental applications by providing the dental practitioner a user interface to control operation of the dental chair and attached dental devices." Its function is described as delivering "air, water, vacuum and electricity to allow the dental practitioner an intuitive control center for all common and normal patient treatment procedures performed in the dental operatory." This description details the function and intended use of the device but not its performance against specific clinical or technical metrics typically found in a study.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1