Search Results

The 3M™ Steri-Vac™ Gas Sterilizer/Aerator is a compact unit designed to sterilize heat- and/or moisture-sensitive devices in the following cycles:

Single or dual channel rigid and flexible scopes can be sterilized with non-lumened medical instruments in any of the GS sterilizer cycles provided the cycle parameters match the instructions. The load per cycle should not exceed 20 lumens.

The 3M Steri-Vac™ GS5 and 3M Steri-Vac™ GS8 models are traditional ethylene oxide (EO) sterilizers that use 100% EO cartridges in a vacuum vessel. The sterilizers use fully automated controls for cycle processing and error handling.

Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the 3M Steri-Vac Sterilizer/Aerator Models GS5 and GS8:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for 3M Steri-Vac Sterilizer/Aerator Models GS5 and GS8

The device in question, the 3M Steri-Vac Sterilizer/Aerator, is an Ethylene Oxide (EO) gas sterilizer intended for sterilizing heat- and/or moisture-sensitive medical devices. The study to prove the device meets acceptance criteria is primarily based on performance testing against recognized consensus standards for EO sterilizers.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The acceptance criteria are derived from the AAMI ST24:1999/(R) 2009 standard, which outlines requirements for automatic, general-purpose ethylene oxide sterilizers. The reported device performance is based on efficacy and physical testing.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size:
  • For efficacy testing (Empty Chamber, Simulated Load, Sterility Assurance): "three consecutive sterilization runs" for each test scenario, for both the GS5 and GS8 models. This means a minimum of 3 runs per model per scenario, so 3 runs x 2 models x 3 scenarios = 18 efficacy runs.
  • For physical testing (temperature, exposure time, RH): The number of runs is not explicitly stated, but it's implied that the controls were "demonstrated" to meet the criteria.
  • For safety and EMC testing: The sample size is not specified, but it implies a single device or a representative sample was tested for certification.
• Data Provenance: The data provenance is internal to 3M Health Care, as they conducted or commissioned the tests to demonstrate compliance with national and international standards. The country of origin for the data is not explicitly stated, but given the company location (St. Paul, MN, USA) and the standards used (AAMI, ISO, IEC, FCC), it's highly likely the testing was conducted in the United States or by labs accredited to these standards globally. The studies are prospective in nature, as they involve testing the performance of the manufactured devices against predefined criteria.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

This type of device (sterilizer) performance evaluation does not typically rely on "experts" to establish a "ground truth" in the same way an AI diagnostic algorithm would. Instead, the ground truth is established by:

• Reference Standards: The AAMI ST24:1999/(R) 2009 standard itself defines the acceptable parameters and methodologies for assessing sterilizer performance, which represents a consensus of experts in sterilization science and engineering.
• Laboratory Procedures: The "ground truth" for sterilization efficacy is the complete inactivation of biological indicators (AAMI challenge test packs). This is determined by standard microbiological culture techniques, not by expert opinion. The "ground truth" for physical parameters (temperature, humidity, time) is measured by calibrated sensors and instruments.

Therefore, the concept of "number of experts used to establish ground truth" with specific qualifications like radiologists is not applicable to this type of device submission.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in studies involving human interpretation (e.g., image reading) where disagreement among readers needs to be resolved. This is not applicable to the performance testing of a sterilizer. The acceptance criteria are objective and measurable; either the device meets the specified inactivation levels or physical parameter ranges, or it does not. Discrepancies would lead to troubleshooting and re-testing, not adjudication of "expert opinions."

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for evaluating diagnostic aids or AI algorithms that assist human readers in tasks like image interpretation. The 3M Steri-Vac Sterilizer is a standalone medical device that performs a physical process (sterilization), not an AI system that assists human decision-making. Therefore, the concept of "how much human readers improve with AI vs. without AI assistance" is not applicable.

6. If a Standalone Study (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

Yes, in a sense, a "standalone" study was done. The efficacy and physical performance testing of the sterilizer is inherently a standalone evaluation of the device's capability to perform its intended function without human intervention during the sterilization cycle. The device's performance (sterilization efficacy, parameter control) is assessed directly. There is no human-in-the-loop during the sterilization process being evaluated. Humans operate the device and interpret the results of the tests, but the device's performance in achieving sterilization is evaluated independently.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth used is primarily based on:

• Biological Indicators (BIs): For efficacy testing, the ground truth for "sterilization" is the complete inactivation of highly resistant microbial spores (e.g., Bacillus atrophaeus) in AAMI challenge test packs, as evidenced by negative culture results after exposure to the sterilization cycle. This is a well-established microbiological method.
• Physical Measurements: For parameters like temperature, exposure time, and relative humidity, the ground truth is established by direct measurement using calibrated sensors and instruments, compared against the specified ranges in the AAMI ST24 standard.
• Safety and EMC Standards: For safety and electromagnetic compatibility, the ground truth is compliance with the specified international and national regulatory standards (e.g., IEC, FCC), verified by accredited testing laboratories.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

The concept of a "training set" is not applicable to this device. This is a hardware device (sterilizer), not an AI algorithm that learns from data. Therefore, there is no training set in the machine learning sense. The device is designed, engineered, and then tested against established performance standards.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

As stated above, there is no training set for this device in the context of AI/machine learning. Therefore, the question of how its ground truth was established is not relevant. The device's design and operational parameters are based on scientific principles of ethylene oxide sterilization and engineering specifications, which are themselves derived from research and industry standards.

Ask a specific question about this device