Search Results

Use the 3M™ Attest™ Super Rapid Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Clear Challenge Pack 1295PCD in conjunction with the 3M™ Attest™ Auto-reader 490 having software version 4.0.0 or greater or a 3M™ Attest™ Mini Auto-reader 490M or a 3M™ Attest™ Auto-reader 490H as a standard method of routine monitoring and performance qualification of vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization processes in the follow systems:

STERRAD 100S® Sterilization System,

STERRAD NX® Sterilization System (Standard and Advanced cycles),

STERRAD 100NX® Sterilization System (Standard, Flex, Express, and Duo cycles),

STERRAD NX® with ALLClear® Technology Sterilization System (Standard and Advanced cycles), STERRAD 100NX® with ALLClear® Technology Sterilization System (Standard, Flex, Express, and Duo cycles),

V-PRO® 1 Low Temperature Sterilization System (Lumen cycle),

V-PRO® 1 Plus Low Temperature Sterilization System (Lumen and Non Lumen cycles),

V-PRO® maX Low Temperature Sterilization System (Lumen, and Flexible cvcles),

V-PRO® 60 Low Temperature Sterilization System (Lumen, and Flexible cycles),

V-PRO® maX 2 Low Temperature Sterilization System (Lumen, Flexible, and Fast Non Lumen cycles),

V-PRO® s2 Low Temperature Sterilization System (Lumen, Flexible, and Fast cycles) SteroScope® Sterilization System

The 3M™ Attest™ Super Rapid Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Clear Challenge Pack 1295PCD is designed as a standard method of rapid and reliable routine monitoring and performance qualification of vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization processes.

The 1295PCD Challenge Pack consists of a clear plastic shell, with two individual channels allowing for air removal and sterilant penetration. Those two individual channels connect to a cavity containing the monitoring products and all are covered by a foil lid. The 1295PCD is a single-use device.

Each 1295PCD Challenge Pack contains a 3M™ Attest™ Rapid Readout Biological Indicator (BI) 1295 (pink cap) and a 3MTM Attest™ Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Tri-Metric Chemical Indicator (CI) 1348. The 1348 CI verifies that the stated values for the three critical parameters of exposure time, temperature, and concentration of vaporized hydrogen peroxide have been achieved and offers an ACCEPT or REJECT reading. The 1295 BI is specifically designed for rapid and reliable routine monitoring of vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization processes when used in conjunction with the 3MTM Attest™ Auto-reader 490 having software version 4.0.0 or greater or a 3MTM Attest™ Mini Auto-reader 490M or a 3M™ Attest™ Auto-reader 490H. The presence of fluorescence within the specified incubation time for the 1295 BI in the 490, 490M, or the 490H Auto-reader indicates a sterilization process failure. A printed chemical process indicator is present on the cap of the 1295 BI and is visible through the clear plastic shell of the challenge pack. The process indicator turns color upon exposure to vaporized hydrogen peroxide and is used by the customer to verify that the challenge pack was exposed to vaporized hydrogen peroxide.

The document describes the non-clinical testing performed to determine the performance of the 3M™ Attest™ Super Rapid Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Clear Challenge Pack 1295PCD. This device is a sterilization biological indicator used for routine monitoring and performance qualification of vaporized hydrogen peroxide sterilization processes. The study's focus was to demonstrate performance in a newly claimed sterilizer, the SteroScope® Sterilization System, as the submission device is otherwise identical to a previously cleared predicate device (K233814).

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Study Details

1. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance: The document does not explicitly state the specific number of units (sample size) used for each test (Full Cycle Performance and Incomplete Cycle Performance). It only indicates that "nonclinical testing was performed." The data provenance is nonclinical testing conducted by the manufacturer (3M Company), specifically for the purpose of this 510(k) submission, and appears to be prospective testing for the additional indication. The country of origin of the data is not specified, but the submission is to the U.S. FDA.

2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: This information is not provided. For this type of device (sterilization biological indicator), "ground truth" is typically established by the physical and chemical parameters of the sterilization process itself, rather than human expert interpretation of images or data. The "ground truth" is whether the sterilization cycle was successful or failed based on controlled conditions.

3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. The "readout" of the biological indicator (fluorescence positive/negative) and chemical indicator (color change/b* value) are direct measurements/observations, not subject to human adjudication in the typical sense of medical imaging interpretation.

4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a physical indicator for sterilization, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool requiring human interpretation. Therefore, an MRMC study is not relevant.

5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: The device's performance is inherently "standalone" in function, as it is a physical indicator reacting to a sterilization process. The interpretation of the results from the biological indicator is done by an auto-reader (3M™ Attest™ Auto-reader 490, 490M, or 490H), which provides a definitive "positive" or "negative" fluorescent response. The chemical indicator also provides a direct visual result. There is no "algorithm only" performance that would be separate from the physical functioning of the device and its dedicated reader.

6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): The ground truth for this device's performance is based on the controlled efficacy of the sterilization process. "Full cycle" conditions represent a successful sterilization based on established standards, intending for the BI to show no growth/negative fluorescence and the CI to show an "ACCEPT" result. "Incomplete cycle" conditions represent a failed sterilization, intending for the BI to show growth/positive fluorescence and the CI to show a "FAIL" result. This is a form of empirical validation against defined physical and biological outcomes under controlled laboratory conditions, rather than expert consensus or pathology on patient data.

7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable and not mentioned. This is a physical device, a biological and chemical indicator, not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.

8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.

Ask a specific question about this device