Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K071794
    Date Cleared
    2008-02-11

    (224 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.2050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    15M MONOCHROME DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY LCD MONITOR MDL2123A (MS51I2)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    21.3 inch (53 cm) Monochrome Digital Mammography LCD Monitor with additional sub-pixel driving techniques designed to improve image quality, MS51i2 (MDL2123A) is intended to be used in displaying and viewing medical images for diagnosis by trained medical practitioners. It is to be used in digital mammography PACS and modalities including FFDM.

    Device Description

    MS51i2 (MDL2123A) is a 21.3-inch (53cm) monochrome LCD monitor whose display resolution is 2048 x 7680 (landscape), 7680 x 2048 (portrait) supporting DVI (digital visual interface).

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical display device, not an AI/ML medical device. Therefore, the typical acceptance criteria and study designs associated with AI/ML devices (e.g., sample sizes for test and training sets, ground truth establishment, MRMC studies) are not applicable or described in this document.

    The document describes a medical display monitor (TOTOKU MS51i2 (MDL2123A)) and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device for displaying and viewing medical images, specifically for digital mammography. The acceptance criteria for such a device primarily revolve around its technical performance specifications to ensure it can accurately display medical images for diagnostic purposes.

    Since the document does not contain the detailed study information typically requested for AI/ML device evaluations, the following breakdown is based on what can be inferred or directly stated from the provided text regarding a display device's performance and validation.


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for TOTOKU MS51i2 (MDL2123A) - Medical Display Monitor

    This section describes the acceptance criteria and a "study" in the context of demonstrating substantial equivalence for a medical display monitor, not an AI/ML diagnostic algorithm. The "study" here refers to the comparisons made to a predicate device and the technical specifications provided, rather than a clinical trial evaluating diagnostic accuracy.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Given this is a display monitor, the "acceptance criteria" relate to its technical specifications and its ability to perform comparably to a predicate device. The document states "MS51i2 (MDL2123A) shares the same characteristics with our predicate device ME551i2 (K061447) except for a newly-developed Independent Sub-pixel Drive (ISD), AR (Anti-Reflection) special coating panel and firmware to display driver by FPGA." This implies that the device's performance meets or exceeds the predicate device's established performance without introducing new safety or effectiveness concerns.

    Acceptance Criterion (Implicit/Inferred)Reported Device Performance
    Display Resolution2048 x 7680 (landscape), 7680 x 2048 (portrait)
    Screen Size21.3 inch (53cm)
    Display TypeMonochrome LCD monitor
    Input Interface SupportDVI (digital visual interface)
    Intended UseDisplaying and viewing medical images for diagnosis by trained medical practitioners in digital mammography PACS and modalities including FFDM.
    Image Quality EnhancementsAdditional sub-pixel driving techniques (Independent Sub-pixel Drive - ISD) designed to improve image quality; AR (Anti-Reflection) special coating panel.
    Substantial EquivalenceDemonstrated to be substantially equivalent to predicate device ME551i2 (K061447) in characteristics for its intended use, with specified improvements.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    Not applicable to this type of device submission. There is no "test set" of medical images in the context of an AI/ML algorithm. The performance of the monitor is assessed based on its technical specifications, manufacturing controls, and comparison to a predicate device.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. Ground truth establishment for a test set of medical images is not relevant for a display monitor's 510(k) submission.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. Adjudication methods are used in studies involving human interpretation or AI/ML output, not for a display monitor's technical evaluation.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    No. An MRMC study is not relevant for a medical display monitor's 510(k) submission. These studies evaluate the diagnostic performance of human readers, sometimes with and without AI assistance. This document describes a passive display device.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) Was Done

    No. This is not an algorithm, but a display device. Standalone performance is not applicable.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    Not applicable for a display monitor. "Ground truth" for an image display would relate to the accuracy of its physical representation of image data, which is governed by technical standards, not expert labels on cases.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1