Search Results

The ZMED VP4000 Video Processor is intended for use in any application where a viewing device (fluoroscope, endoscope, laparoscope, etc.) and monitor are incorporated to aid in diagnosis and treatment of a disease such as an arthroscopy or cholecystectomy.

The ZMED VP4000 is a simple-to install, easy to use video processing system which provides powerful real-time enhancement of input video signals. The enhanced output video provides increased clarity, contrast, and detail, aiding in the ability to see through smoke, in poor lighting conditions, and other suboptimal conditions. The VP4000 is connected between a video source and a display. The system uses standard electronic components to implement patented algorithms which are designed to improve the ability of the human eye to perceive fine details in the image which might otherwise be obscured by smoke, haze, poor lighting, etc. This is accomplished via a combination of locally-adaptive contrast enhancement using a very large-kernel convolution operation (identical to that used in the CE3000), and histogram-based operations. Like the CE3000, a key feature of the VP4000 is its ability to perform these complex operations in real time, adding virtually imperceptible system latency from input of raw video to output of enhanced video. The effectiveness of the algorithms combined with this real-time capability makes the VP4000 ideally suited for use in applications which live video is required to perform a given function. The VP4000 chassis is constructed of lightweight aluminum, measures 15.7" wide by 12.0" deep by 1.7" high, and weighs 4.95 pounds. The device is compatible with DVI-D and HD-SDI video signals in a variety of standard resolutions, up to 1080p. Internally, the VP4000 is constructed using UL- and IEC-approved components, circuit boards, and harnessing.

The provided text describes the ZMED VP4000 Video Processor, its intended use, and a comparison to a predicate device (DigiVision CE3000). It highlights the device's ability to enhance video signals for increased clarity, contrast, and detail, aiding in visualization in suboptimal conditions. However, the document does not contain any information regarding specific acceptance criteria, study methodologies, device performance metrics, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment relevant to the device's enhanced video output capabilities.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them with the provided information. The document focuses on regulatory approval (510(k)) based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device, safety standards (IEC, FCC), and functional description, rather than clinical performance studies demonstrating the effectiveness of the video enhancement.

Here's a breakdown of why the request cannot be fully answered with the given text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not explicitly stated. The document focuses on meeting safety standards and being substantially equivalent to a predicate.
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not mentioned. No performance study data is provided.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not mentioned. No performance study data is provided.
4. Adjudication method: Not mentioned. No performance study data is provided.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not mentioned. The device is a video processor, not explicitly an AI system as described here, and no comparative effectiveness study data is provided.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not mentioned. No performance study data is provided.
7. The type of ground truth used: Not mentioned. No performance study data is provided.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as this is not an AI/machine learning device in the context of the provided document. The device uses "patented algorithms" to enhance video, but no explicit "training set" for AI is discussed.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

The document primarily serves as a 510(k) summary for FDA clearance, demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device (DigiVision CE3000) based on intended use, technological characteristics, and safety testing. It clarifies that the VP4000 is an evolutionary development of the CE3000, adapting to modern digital video formats and improved components, but does not detail a clinical study proving the performance benefits of its video enhancement features against specific, measurable criteria.

Ask a specific question about this device