Search Results

ID Free® Personal Lubricant is for or penile, anal and/or vaginal application intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. This product is compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprenecondoms. This product is not compatible with polyurethane condoms.

ID Free® Personal Lubricant is a personal lubricant, for penile, anal and/or vaginal application intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. The product is intended for over-the-counter use.

The device is a non-sterile water based personal lubricant with a clear, odorless formulation. The device is packaged in nonsterile 8.5 fl. oz/250 ml plastic/PET bottles with a screw-on cap and flip top closure, or in 0.14 fl. oz/4 ml foil sachets.

The device is compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms. It is not compatible with polyurethane condoms. This product is not a contraceptive and does not contain a spermicide.

The device formulation consists of water, propanediol, hydroxyethyl cellulose, carbomer, PEG-45M, tetrahydroxypropyl ethylenediamine, EDTA, caprylhydroxamic acid, and sucralose.

Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria:

Device: ID Free® Personal Lubricant
Regulation Name: Condom (as a personal lubricant, product code NUC)

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not specify exact sample sizes for each test in phrases like "The results of this testing demonstrate..." or "The results of the testing demonstrate that...". It refers to the standards (e.g., USP , USP , USP , ISO 10993 series, ASTM D7661-18) which would define the sample sizes required for each specific test.

• Data Provenance: The studies are non-clinical performance tests conducted for regulatory submission. There is no mention of country of origin for the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective in terms of patient data, as these are in vitro and in vivo animal (for some biocompatibility) tests, not human trials.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

Not applicable. The ground truth for this medical device (a personal lubricant) is established by adherence to recognized international and national standards and test methods (e.g., ISO, ASTM, USP) for specific physical, chemical, microbiological, and biological properties, rather than expert consensus on a diagnostic outcome. The "experts" would be the scientists and technicians conducting the tests according to the specified methodologies.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable for this type of device and testing. Adjudication methods like "2+1" or "3+1" are typically used in clinical studies or human-reader performance evaluations, particularly for image-based diagnostics. The performance of this device is determined by quantitative and qualitative measurements against established specifications in laboratory settings.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

No. An MRMC study is not relevant for this device. It is a type of study used to evaluate diagnostic imaging systems where multiple human readers interpret cases, often with and without AI assistance, to assess the impact of AI on diagnostic performance. This device is a personal lubricant, not a diagnostic tool.

6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

Not applicable. This device is a physical product (personal lubricant), not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by:

• Defined Specifications: Physical and chemical properties (color, appearance, odor, viscosity, pH, osmolality) have explicit numerical ranges or descriptions that must be met.
• Standardized Test Methods and Criteria:
  • Microbiological: Adherence to USP (Total microbial counts) and USP (Absence of specified objectionable microorganisms), and USP (Antimicrobial Effectiveness Test) acceptance criteria. These standards define the "ground truth" for microbiological safety.
  • Biocompatibility: Adherence to ISO 10993 series standards outcomes (non-cytotoxic, non-sensitizing, non-irritating, not systemically toxic).
  • Condom Compatibility: Adherence to ASTM D7661-18 for compatibility with specific condom materials.
• Real-time Stability Data: The device maintained its specifications over a 24-month shelf-life at a specified condition (25°C).

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This is a physical product, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.

Ask a specific question about this device

ID® Millennium® is a personal lubricant, for penile and /or vaginal application, intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. This product is compatible with natural rubber latex, polyisoprene, and polyurethane condoms.

ID® Moments® Silicone is a personal lubricant, for penile and /or vaginal application, intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. This product is compatible with natural rubber latex, polyisoprene, and polyurethane condoms.

ID® Millennium® is non-sterile, an over-the-counter silicone based personal lubricant, formulated to be clear, non-irritating, non-greasy natural and odorless. This device is silicone soluble liquid for use as a personal lubricant. ID® Millennium® Personal Lubricant contains a blend of silicone fluid ingredients similar to ingredients found in the predicate device. ID® Millennium® Personal Lubricant is neither a contraceptive nor a spermicide.

The device is available in the following variant personal lubricant formulas: ID® Millennium® and ID Moments® Silicone.

ID® Millennium® Personal Lubricant is provided in plastic/PET bottles with screw-on cap, flip top closure, pump dispensers, and foils.

This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a personal lubricant, ID® Millennium® and ID® Moments® Silicone, classified as a Class II device under Condoms (21 CFR 884.5300). The submission aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, Wet Platinum Premium Lubricant® (K130012).

Here's an analysis of the provided information regarding acceptance criteria and supporting studies:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided document describes several tests performed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the ID® Millennium® and ID® Moments® Silicone lubricants. The acceptance criteria are implicitly or explicitly stated as the desired outcome of these tests (e.g., "not cytotoxic," "non-sensitizing," "not an irritant and not systemically toxic," compatible with condoms).

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the specific numerical sample sizes for each test (e.g., how many rabbits for irritation, how many condoms for compatibility testing, how many batches for specifications). It mentions "retains" for shelf-life testing and "major brand name" condoms, which implies a representative selection.
• Data Provenance: The studies appear to be conducted by or for Westridge Laboratories, Inc. The standards referenced (ISO, USP, ASTM) are international and national standards, but the physical location where the tests were performed is not specified. The studies are prospective in nature, as they involve testing the actual device to generate performance data.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

This type of product does not involve "ground truth" established by human experts in the way an AI diagnostic device would. Instead, the "ground truth" or acceptance criteria are derived from:

• Standardized Test Methods: ISO, USP, and ASTM standards provide predefined methodologies and acceptable limits for chemical, biological, and physical properties.
• Scientific Principles: Biocompatibility, sterility, and material compatibility are judged against established scientific and regulatory principles for medical devices.

Therefore, the concept of "number of experts" and their "qualifications" for establishing a diagnostic ground truth is not applicable here. The expertise lies in the certified labs and personnel who conduct these tests according to the specified standards.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in clinical studies or AI performance evaluations where subjective expert interpretations are involved. For the objective laboratory tests described for this lubricant, such adjudication is not applicable. The results are based on objective measurements and observations according to the test protocols.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. MRMC studies are specific to evaluating human reader performance, often in diagnostic imaging, and comparing it with or without AI assistance. This device is a personal lubricant, not a diagnostic or imaging device, so MRMC studies are not relevant.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

No, a standalone (algorithm only) performance study was not done. This device is a physical product (a personal lubricant), not an algorithm or AI system. Therefore, the concept of "standalone performance" for an algorithm is not applicable. The performance studies evaluate the physical and chemical properties of the lubricant itself.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" in this context refers to the defined acceptable biological, chemical, and physical properties as determined by:

• International Standards: ISO 10993 for biocompatibility.
• National Pharmacopeia: USP , , , for microbiological and certain physical properties.
• Industry Standards: ASTM 7661-10 for condom compatibility.
• Manufacturer's Internal Specifications: For viscosity, specific gravity, appearance, color, and odor, as well as for defining the shelf-life testing parameters.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

This product is not an AI/ML device, so there is no "training set" in the computational sense. The product development would involve formulations, pilot batches, and iterative testing, but not a "training set" for an algorithm.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

As there is no training set for an algorithm, this question is not applicable. The formulation and development of the lubricant would be based on chemical engineering principles, material science, and regulatory requirements, rather than a data-driven "ground truth" for machine learning.

Ask a specific question about this device

I-D Glide lubricant is intended enhance the comfort and ease of intimate activity and is compatible with latex and polyurethane condoms.
Personal lubricant for penile and vaginal use only. Compatible with latex and polyurethane condoms.

I-D Glide Personal lubricant is a water-based non-sterile personal lubricant containing purified water, glycerin, propylene glycol, cellulose polymer, PEG 90m, Carbomer 981, various antifungal preservatives, pH adjuster, and chelating agent.

This document is a 510(k) summary for the I-D Glide Lubricant, indicating it is a premarket notification to the FDA to demonstrate substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices. The document does not describe a study with acceptance criteria and device performance in the way typically associated with medical imaging or diagnostic AI. Instead, it demonstrates equivalence through a comparison of product characteristics and intended use.

Here's an analysis based on the provided text, addressing the points where information is available and noting where it's not:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a quantitative performance metric sense (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Instead, the "acceptance criteria" can be inferred as satisfying the characteristics of the predicate devices. The "reported device performance" is the device's characteristics aligning with those of the predicates.

Note: The I-D Glide exceeds one predicate (Qualis, Inc.'s Personal Lubricating Gel) by being "Antimicrobial Tested" while still being substantially equivalent to the other predicate (Instead, Inc's Instead Intimate Lubricant) which is also antimicrobial tested.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

This is not applicable as this is a comparison to predicate devices based on product characteristics and general testing (biocompatibility, antimicrobial), not a clinical study with a "test set" in the context of an AI device's performance.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

This is not applicable. The "ground truth" here is the established characteristics and testing performed on the predicate devices and the new device, not expert interpretation of data.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

This is not applicable.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This is not applicable. This document pertains to a personal lubricant, not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This is not applicable as this is not an algorithm or AI device.

7. The type of ground truth used

The "ground truth" used for this submission is based on the characteristics and testing performed on the device itself (I-D Glide) and the established characteristics and testing of the predicate devices (Instead Intimate Lubricant and Qualis Personal Lubricating Gel). This includes:

• Intended Use: As defined by the manufacturer and accepted by the FDA for similar products.
• Compositional Analysis: Listing of ingredients.
• Physical Properties: Water-solubility.
• Safety Testing: Biocompatibility testing, antimicrobial testing.

8. The sample size for the training set

This is not applicable. There is no AI model or "training set" for a personal lubricant.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This is not applicable.

Summary of Device Meeting Acceptance Criteria:

The device, I-D Glide Lubricant, meets the inferred acceptance criteria by demonstrating substantial equivalence to two legally marketed predicate devices (Instead, Inc.'s Instead Intimate Lubricant and Qualis, Inc.'s Personal Lubricating Gel). This is "proven" by a detailed comparison table showing that I-D Glide shares the same common name, product code, intended use, over-the-counter status, water-solubility, presence of purified water and preservatives, and has undergone biocompatibility testing, just like the predicate devices. Furthermore, I-D Glide also underwent antimicrobial testing, aligning with one predicate and exceeding the other, thus not raising new questions of safety or effectiveness. The FDA's 510(k) clearance letter (K051295) confirms that the FDA reviewed the submission and determined the device is substantially equivalent to the predicates for its stated indications for use.

Ask a specific question about this device