Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K231794
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2023-12-22

    (185 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.5300
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Elegant™ Advanced CompHort is a personal lubricant for vaginal application, intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. This product is compatible with polyurethane condoms. This product is not compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms.

    Device Description

    Elegant™ Advanced CompHort is a line extension to the "Elegant™" range to extend claims. It is a non-sterile, water-based, pearly white, non-irritating, non-greasy, hormone-free, paraben-free, fragrance-free, moisturizing creams for vaginal dryness. It is a personal lubricant that provides lubrication, and it is intended for ongoing use and is not exclusively for use during intimate sexual activity. The formulation of Elegant™ Advanced CompHort contains purified water, polycarbophil, carbomer homopolymer type B, labrafac, emulfree P, sorbic acid and sodium hydroxide. Elegant™ Advanced CompHort is packaged in an aluminium tube and applied using a reusable plastic applicator marked to deliver 3ml of product. Elegant™ Advanced CompHort is to be sold as an over-the-counter (OTC) product.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the U.S. FDA for a personal lubricant called "Elegant™ Advanced CompHort." It aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. The document focuses on physical, chemical, and biological testing rather than an AI/ML-based diagnostic device.

    Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving an AI/ML device meets these criteria, including elements like data provenance, experts for ground truth, MRMC studies, and training set information, cannot be extracted from this document.

    The document details the following for the personal lubricant:

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance:

    This document provides device specifications (acceptance criteria) and the results from performance testing (reported device performance) in Table 1 and in the "Summary of Performance Data" section.

    Table 1. Device Specifications for Elegant™ Advanced CompHort

    ParameterTest MethodSpecification (Acceptance Criteria)Reported Performance (Results from Shelf-Life Testing)
    AppearanceVisual inspectionWhite to off-whiteMaintained specifications over 24 months
    Density (g/cm³)Ph. Eur 2.2.5; USP0.9970 - 0.9995Maintained specifications over 24 months
    pHUSP2.5-3.5Maintained specifications over 24 months
    Consistency (1/10mm)Ph. Eur 2.9.9145 - 200Maintained specifications over 24 months
    Viscosity (Pa.s)USP120 - 220Maintained specifications over 24 months
    Osmolality (mOsm/kg)USP15-35Maintained specifications over 24 months
    Total Aerobic Microbial Count (TAMC)USP≤ 10² CFU/gMaintained specifications over 24 months
    Total combined yeasts/molds count (TYMC)USP≤ 10¹ CFU/gMaintained specifications over 24 months
    Absence of pathogenic organisms: Staphylococcus Aureus, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, and Candida AlbicansUSPAbsentMaintained specifications over 24 months
    Antimicrobial Effectiveness TestUSPBacteria: No less than 2.0 log reduction at 14 days and no increase from 14-day count at the 28-day count
    Yeast/Mold: No increase from the initial calculated count at 14 and 28 dayMaintained specifications over 24 months

    Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria:

    The document describes the following performance testing to demonstrate the device meets its specifications and is safe and effective:

    • Biocompatibility Testing: Performed in accordance with the 2020 FDA guidance document "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1."

      • Tests Conducted:
        • Cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5
        • Vaginal Irritation per ISO 10993-10
        • Sensitization per ISO 10993-10
        • Acute Systemic Toxicity per ISO 10993-11:2017
      • Results: The device was found to be non-cytotoxic, non-irritating, non-sensitizing, and non-systemically toxic. A clinical test in women also reported no adverse events.
    • Shelf-Life Testing:

      • Conditions: Conducted at 25°C/60% RH.
      • Duration: Data generated up to 24 months.
      • Results: Demonstrated that the device can maintain its specifications (as shown in Table 1) over the duration of a 24-month shelf-life.
    • Condom Compatibility Testing:

      • Method: Evaluated in accordance with ASTM D7661-10 "Standard Test Method for Determining Compatibility of Personal Lubricants with Natural Rubber Latex Condoms."
      • Results: The device is compatible with polyurethane condoms. It is not compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • Sample size: Not explicitly stated in numerical terms (e.g., "N=XX samples"). The testing appears to be laboratory-based and possibly involved animal testing for biocompatibility before the clinical test mentioned for women.
    • Data Provenance: Not specified regarding country of origin. The testing methods refer to internationally recognized standards (ISO, USP, ASTM), suggesting standard laboratory practices. The clinical test result ("clinically tested in women") implies prospective data collection, but no further details are given.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • This information is not applicable to this type of device and study. The testing relies on established physical, chemical, and biological test methods and standard specifications, rather than expert consensus on diagnostic image interpretation or similar.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

    • Not applicable. This is not a study requiring adjudication of interpretations.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML diagnostic device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

    • The "ground truth" here is defined by the established physical, chemical, and microbiological specifications (e.g., pH range, viscosity range, absence of specific pathogens) and biological compatibility outcomes (non-irritating, non-cytotoxic, etc.) as determined by standardized laboratory test methods (e.g., USP, ISO, ASTM).

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device requiring a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K201612
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2021-09-02

    (444 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.5300
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Elegant™ 2 in 1 Vaginal Moisturizer/ Elegant™ Advanced 5 is a personal lubricant for vaginal application, intended to moisturize and lubricate, to enhance the ease and comfort of intimate sexual activity and supplement the body's natural lubrication. This product is compatible with polyurethane condoms. This product is not compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms.

    Device Description

    The subject device is a non-sterile, water-based, personal lubricant that provides lubrication during intimate sexual activity. The formulation contains purified water, polycarbophil, carbomer homopolymer type B, labrafac, emulfree P, sorbic acid and sodium hydroxide. Elegant™ 2 in 1 Vaginal Moisturizer is packaged in an aluminium tube and applied using a reusable plastic applicator marked to deliver 2ml of product. Elegant™ Advanced 5, is packaged in an aluminium tube and applied using a reusable plastic applicator marked to deliver 3ml of product. Elegant™ 2 in 1 Vaginal Moisturizer and Elegant™ Advanced 5 are personal lubricants for over-the-counter (OTC) use.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Elegant™ 2 in 1 Vaginal Moisturizer and Elegant™ Advanced 5. This document assesses the substantial equivalence of a new medical device to a legally marketed predicate device. The information required primarily applies to AI/ML medical devices, which this product (a personal lubricant) is not. Therefore, specific details like sample sizes for training/test sets, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods, or MRMC studies are not applicable or provided for this type of device.

    However, I can extract the acceptance criteria and a summary of the studies conducted to demonstrate the device meets those criteria, as much as possible from the provided text.

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document provides "Device Specifications" in Table 1, which serve as the acceptance criteria for the physical and biological properties of the lubricant. It also summarizes the performance studies conducted to demonstrate compliance with these specifications and other safety/effectiveness aspects.

    ParameterAcceptance Criteria (Specification)Reported Device Performance (Summary from studies)
    Physical/Chemical Specifications (from Table 1)
    AppearanceWhite to off-whiteImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Density USP0.9970 - 0.9995 g/cm²Implied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    pH USP2.5-3.5Implied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Consistency Ph.Eur 2.9.9145 – 200 mmImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Viscosity USP120 - 220 Pa-sImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Osmolality USP15 – 35 mOsm/kgImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Microbiological Specifications (from Table 1)
    Total Aerobic Microbial Count (TAMC) USP≤ 10² CFU/gImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Total combined yeasts/molds count (TYMC) USP≤ 10¹ CFU/gImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Absence of pathogenic organisms: Staphylococcus Aureus, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Candida Albicans USPAbsentImplied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Antimicrobial Effectiveness USPBacteria: No less than 2.0 log reduction at 14 days and no increase from 14-day count at the 28-day count. Yeast/Mold: No increase from the initial calculated count at 14 and 28 count.Implied to meet this, as the shelf-life testing demonstrated the device can maintain its specifications.
    Biological SafetyNon-cytotoxic, non-irritating, non-sensitizing, and non-systemically toxic.Results of biocompatibility testing (Cytotoxicity, Intra-vaginal tolerance, Penile irritation, Sensitisation, Acute Systemic Toxicity) demonstrated that Elegant™ 2 in 1 Vaginal Moisturizer and Elegant™ Advanced 5 are non-cytotoxic, non-irritating, non-sensitizing, and non-systemically toxic.
    Shelf-LifeMaintain all Table 1 specifications over the stated shelf-life.Long term data at 25°C/60% RH and accelerated data at 35°C/65% RH for the specifications in Table 1 have been generated up to 6 months, supporting an equivalent of a 12-month shelf life.
    Condom CompatibilityCompatible with polyurethane condoms. Not compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms.Testing conducted in accordance with ASTM D7661-10 confirmed the subject device is compatible with polyurethane condoms. It was also found to be not compatible with natural rubber latex and polyisoprene condoms, which is explicitly stated and accepted as a difference from the predicate device that does not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document does not specify sample sizes for the biological or chemical tests, which is typical for this type of submission focusing on standard test methodology and results. The studies appear to be laboratory-based and likely prospective, following recognized international and national standards (e.g., ISO, USP, ICH, ASTM). No country of origin for the data is explicitly mentioned, but the submitter is Viramal Limited, located in the United Kingdom.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    This is not applicable to a personal lubricant. The "ground truth" for this device type is established by standardized laboratory testing methods (e.g., pH meters for pH, specific assays for microbial counts, etc.), not expert consensus on interpretations.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    This is not applicable to a personal lubricant. Standard laboratory tests do not use adjudication methods in the way clinical studies for diagnostic algorithms do.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This is not applicable to a personal lubricant. MRMC studies are relevant for medical imaging or similar diagnostic AI/ML devices.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This is not applicable to a personal lubricant, as it is not an AI/ML algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    The "ground truth" for the performance criteria (specifications) of this device is based on objective measurements obtained through standardized laboratory testing methods (e.g., USP monographs for pH, density, viscosity, osmolality, microbial counts; ISO standards for biocompatibility; ASTM standards for condom compatibility).

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This is not applicable to a personal lubricant, as it is not an AI/ML device and does not involve training data.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This is not applicable to a personal lubricant.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1