Search Results

The V Quick Patch System is intended to be used as an electrocardiograph electrode and a placement device for the placement of electrocardiograph electrodes.

The V Quick Patch™ is a single-use disposable device. It consists of two components. One component is mylar electrode positioning guide. It has pre-cut channels and measurement markings for movement and placement of electrodes. The second component consists of ten post-style Ag/AgCI ECG electrodes six of which are pre-mounted into the channels of the mylar positioning guide. The which are identical to other post-style Ag/AgCI electrodes currently on the market except for a raised mylar disc affixed to the top of the six precordial electrodes which allows the precordial electrodes to remain attached to the positioning guide and to be moved within the channels of the positioning guide for placement on a patient's chest.

The provided text describes the V Quick Patch, an ECG electrode placement device, and a clinical study conducted to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study, based on the provided information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document implicitly defines the acceptance criteria by stating the device was found to be "as safe and as effective" as standard electrodes, and that the produced ECGs were "equivalent." The specific metrics for equivalency are not detailed, but the core criteria appear to be:

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Sample Size: 100 patients.
• Data Provenance: Retrospective, as the study was conducted at the University of Cincinnati with patients who "suffered from cardiac or pulmonary disease." This indicates existing medical records were likely utilized or a patient cohort with pre-existing conditions was recruited. The country of origin is implicitly the USA (University of Cincinnati).

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications:

The document does not specify the number of experts used to establish ground truth or their qualifications. It only states that the study "found that the V Quick patch electrodes produced electrocardiograms (ECG's) that were equivalent to ECG's produced by the standard precordial tab-style electrode." This implies expert interpretation, but details are lacking.

4. Adjudication Method:

The document does not specify any adjudication method used for the test set.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

An MRMC study was not explicitly mentioned. The study compared the device's ECGs to standard electrodes, but it doesn't describe multiple readers assessing cases to determine an effect size of human improvement with AI assistance. The device itself is a physical placement aid, not an AI for interpretation.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance:

This question is not applicable as the V Quick Patch is a physical electrode placement device, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, there is no "algorithm only" performance to evaluate.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

The ground truth used was expert assessment/comparison of ECGs. The study aimed to show that ECGs produced by the V Quick Patch were "equivalent" to those produced by standard electrodes. This implies that the 'standard' or 'accepted' interpretation of ECGs produced by traditional methods served as the benchmark.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

The document does not provide information about a separate training set. The clinical study of 100 patients appears to be the primary evaluation set for demonstrating the device's performance.

9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established:

This question is not applicable as no separate training set is described. If the 100-patient study served as both training and testing (which is unlikely in a rigorous study design but possible for a simple comparison), then the ground truth would have been established as described in point 7.

Ask a specific question about this device